Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2024 (English)In: Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, ISSN 2213-1388, E-ISSN 2213-1396, Vol. 71, article id 103970Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
This research raises the possibility for households in energy poverty to participate in shared photovoltaic systems in renewable energy communities (REC) to reduce their energy costs, with investment costs covered by public institutions. It begins by evaluating the current solution for vulnerable households, which relies on public subsidies to lower energy costs without addressing root causes or improving environmental impacts. The study compares traditional subsidies with REC participation for vulnerable households. By simulating a REC composed of such households, the results indicate that REC participation is more cost-effective for public institutions than energy subsidies. At the economically optimal size of 31 kWp, the cost of subsidies decreases by 58,000 €, a 50% reduction, with household savings increasing by 6%. At 58 kWp, the need for additional support checks is eliminated, increasing household savings by 65% but with a lower NPV of 22,500 €. The largest viable system, 75 kWp, increases average household savings by 82%. This approach also leads to a net reduction in GHG emissions, engaging previously excluded households in the energy transition.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV, 2024
Keywords
Energy checks, Energy poverty, Just energy transition, Renewable energy communities, Self-consumption
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-353909 (URN)10.1016/j.seta.2024.103970 (DOI)001321503700001 ()2-s2.0-85204046320 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20241014
2024-09-252024-09-252024-10-14Bibliographically approved