kth.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 12) Show all publications
Anund Vogel, J., Lind, H. & Holm, C. (2024). A Note on Developing A New Type of Construction Contracts to Promote New Technologies and Sustainability. Civil Engineering Research Journal, 14(5)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A Note on Developing A New Type of Construction Contracts to Promote New Technologies and Sustainability
2024 (English)In: Civil Engineering Research Journal, E-ISSN 2575-8950, Vol. 14, no 5Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In its different forms, the built environment is the single largest energy consumer in the EU, and one of the largest carbon dioxide emitters. Green buildings and smart technologies are two of the most important elements to reach this goal. In a situation where the use of new technologies and new knowledge becomes more important as well as the news flow increase the role of the technical consultant becomes more important. Also, the client/developer role become increasingly important when buildings turn from storage facilities to service generating entities. A closer alliance between client and consultant is necessary to align business models with new technologies. Contracts are the most important instrument to shape incentive structures for optimal economic outcomes, as well as for shaping incentives for optimal operation of smart and sustainable buildings. In this paper we propose a contract design that incentivise consultants to fully use their knowledge to make sure that planned systems are installed and operated in an optimal manner. There are in general two approaches to this type of contract design. The first is to write a detailed contract setting out how to deal with possible outcomes going forward. The second, and the approach used in this paper, is to write a less detailed contract that sets out a framework of incentives for continuing cooperation and to keep a good reputation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Juniper Publishers, 2024
Keywords
Contracts; Incentives; Construction sector; Sustainable buildings; Collaboration
National Category
Law and Society Construction Management
Research subject
Real Estate and Construction Management
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-347263 (URN)10.19080/cerj.2024.14.555900 (DOI)
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2021-00340
Note

QC 20240611

Available from: 2024-06-07 Created: 2024-06-07 Last updated: 2024-06-11Bibliographically approved
Fagrell, P. & Anund Vogel, J. (2024). Building The Future: Unveiling Educational and Competence Demands for Smart and Sustainable Buildings. Civil engineering research journal, 14(3)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Building The Future: Unveiling Educational and Competence Demands for Smart and Sustainable Buildings
2024 (English)In: Civil engineering research journal, ISSN 2575-8950, Vol. 14, no 3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Swedish construction sector is said to be highly traditional with a slow pace of development, e.g., in terms of adapting new technologies. However, current developments related mainly to digitalization, but also sustainability and entrepreneurship, are forcing this sector to change from almost static to highly dynamic. This paper presents results from an interview study performed with eight industry experts from various property management and/or construction companies in Sweden, all in different ways connected to research at KTH Live-In Lab. The interviews were performed to discuss and identify what engineering skills are required to operate and manage the smart and sustainable buildings of the future. The results indicate that changes in the three areas of digitalization, sustainability and entrepreneurship have different characteristics. The interviewees describe rapid changes in these areas, changes that have an unknown end goal. What is asked for in the construction industry seems unreachable. The construction sector cannot fully harvest the benefits of ongoing technological development, and academia is, in the short term, unable to help. Hence, dedicated actors solve the competence need outside traditional university educational programs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
California: , 2024
Keywords
Smart buildings; Education; Competence; Digitalization; Sustainability; Entrepreneurship
National Category
Learning Other Civil Engineering Construction Management
Research subject
Education and Communication in the Technological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-343153 (URN)10.19080/CERJ.2024.14.555888 (DOI)
Note

QC 20240208

Available from: 2024-02-08 Created: 2024-02-08 Last updated: 2024-02-08Bibliographically approved
Molinari, M., Anund Vogel, J., Rolando, D. & Lundqvist, P. (2023). Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study. Applied Energy, 338, 120877-120877, Article ID 120877.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study
2023 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 338, p. 120877-120877, article id 120877Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The adoption of innovation in the building sector is currently too slow for the ambitious sustainability goals thatour societies have agreed upon. Living labs are open innovation ecosystems in real-life environments usingiterative feedback processes throughout a lifecycle approach of an innovation to create sustainable impact. In thecontext of the built environment, such co-creative innovation and demonstration platforms are needed tofacilitate the adoption of innovative technologies and concepts for more energy-efficient and sustainablebuildings. However, their feasibility is not extensively proven. This paper illustrates the implementation anddemonstrates the feasibility of the Living Labs Triangle Framework for buildings living labs. This conceptualframework has been used to conceive the KTH Live-In Lab, a living lab for buildings. The goal of the Live-In Labwas to create a co-creative open platform for research and education bridging the gap between industry andacademia, featuring smart building demonstrators. The Living Lab Triangle Framework has been deployed tomeet the goals of the Live-in Lab, and the resulting concept is described. This paper then analyses the meth-odological and operational results introducing performance metrics to measure the economic sustainability, thepromotion of multidisciplinary research and development projects, dissemination and impact. The results arecompleted with a SWOT analysis identifying its current strengths and weaknesses. The results collected in thiswork fill a missing gap in the scientific literature on the performance of living labs and provide empirical evi-dence on the sustainability and impact of living labs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV, 2023
Keywords
Living labs Innovation Building industry Smart buildings Building demonstrators Built environment
National Category
Energy Engineering Building Technologies
Research subject
Energy Technology; Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-324845 (URN)10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120877 (DOI)000955580100001 ()2-s2.0-85150014674 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 47859-1Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, RIT17-0046
Note

QC 20230321

Available from: 2023-03-17 Created: 2023-03-17 Last updated: 2023-04-14Bibliographically approved
Molinari, M., Anund Vogel, J. & Rolando, D. (2021). Using Living Labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study. In: Technology Innovation to Accelerate Energy Transitions: . Paper presented at Applied Energy Symposium: MIT A+B, August 11-13 May 2021, MIT Cambridge USA. Applied Energy Innovation Institute (AEii)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Using Living Labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study
2021 (English)In: Technology Innovation to Accelerate Energy Transitions, Applied Energy Innovation Institute (AEii) , 2021Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The adoption of innovation in the buildingsector is currently too low for the ambitious sustainability goals that our societies have agreed upon. The concept of smart building, for instance, is being implemented too slowly. One of the main reasons for this is that technologies have to be proven effective and reliable before being introduced at large scale in buildings. Testbeds and demonstrators are seen as a crucial infrastructure to test and demonstrate the impact of solutions in the building sector and hence facilitate their adoption in buildings. The KTHLive-In Lab is a platform of building testbeds designed to this scope. This work describes the Live-In Lab vision,approach, technical features,provides an overview on the multidisciplinary projects that it has enabled and discusses its replicability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Applied Energy Innovation Institute (AEii), 2021
Keywords
smartbuildings, testbeds, living labs, sustainable buildings, co-creation lab, collaboration platform
National Category
Building Technologies Construction Management Architectural Engineering
Research subject
Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Service and Energy Systems; Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Technology; Architecture, Architectural Design
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-316637 (URN)10.46855/energy-proceedings-10088 (DOI)2-s2.0-85191022606 (Scopus ID)
Conference
Applied Energy Symposium: MIT A+B, August 11-13 May 2021, MIT Cambridge USA
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 47859-1
Note

QC 20220831

Available from: 2022-08-26 Created: 2022-08-26 Last updated: 2024-06-19Bibliographically approved
Anund Vogel, J., Van Bueren, E., Verhoef, L., Goldberg, B., Lundqvist, P. & Sarin, E. (2020). Co-Creation in Living Labs to Accelerate Innovation. Civil Engineering Research Journal, 10(1), Article ID 555776.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Co-Creation in Living Labs to Accelerate Innovation
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Civil Engineering Research Journal, ISSN 2575-8950, Vol. 10, no 1, article id 555776Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Innovation in the construction sector occurs as stepwise reconfigurations of subsystems, but sometimes the effect of many systems coincides and there is so called radical change. Stepwise reconfigurations of individual systems such as windows, insulation, and heat recovery systems have made it possible to heat buildings with preheated inlet air instead of water radiators. Thus, making building more sustainable, cheaper and resource-efficient; the potential for radical change has been achieved. The question is then why not every new building uses preheated inlet air? The reason is not the lack of innovation or new technologies. It is rather connected to malfunctioning structures related to incentives, collaboration, testing, and validation, resulting in norms and standards that aim to reproduce existing technologies, preferring incremental innovations over radical ones.This article argues that testbeds and Living Labs are a way to work on complex, multi-stakeholder and urgent problems in a co-creative way. In these labs there are possibilities to test technologies, in systems, in real buildings and cities. There are possibilities to follow-up, measure and adjust; to live, study, work and develop. The Living Labs have the potential of making new technologies standard to use in the course of years instead of decades and thus minimize unnecessary use of resources linked to the construction and use of buildings. In addition, it will help to make technologies more user-friendly, considering user needs, wishes and experiences, thus contributing to the effectiveness of the technologies developed and tested.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Irvine California United States: Juniper Publishers, 2020
Keywords
Living lab; Testbeds; Co-creation; Innovation; Sustainability; Multi-stakeholder; Participatory; Impact
National Category
Other Civil Engineering Educational Sciences Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-282648 (URN)10.19080/CERJ.2020.10.555776 (DOI)
Note

QC 20201009

Available from: 2020-10-09 Created: 2020-10-09 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved
Anund Vogel, J. (2020). Incentivising Innovation in the Swedish Construction Industry. (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Incentivising Innovation in the Swedish Construction Industry
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Almost 40 percent of global final energy use and CO2 emissions are connected to buildings and building-related activities; it is therefore important to incentivise the design and construction of resource-efficient buildings. Unfortunately, energy demand and associated emissions in the sector continue to grow. Such incentives will help achieve energy and environmental targets, reduce costs, and make smart and sustainable buildings and cities possible at a larger scale. Because novel technologies carry risks alongside their advantages, developers, contractors and consultants must have incentives to reduce and share those risks in a rational way if we are to meet the crucial long-term societal goals of reduced use of resources and emissions.

 

I hypothesise that there are legal and institutional frameworks (rules, building codes, regulations, standard contracts, etc.) that result in weak or negative incentives for construction industry actors to invest in, propose, and install resource-efficient technologies. If the hypothesis holds true, then the goal is to identify ways to better incentivise construction industry actors to fully engage in the design and construction of smart and sustainable buildings.

 

To tackle this, four studies were carried out using a mixed-method approach. Paper 1 identifies 38 barriers to energy efficiency in Swedish multifamily buildings. The next study (Paper 2) develops a categorisation framework in order to understand where to engage to overcome or bypass barriers to energy efficiency. Paper 3 and 4 are devoted to analysing two sets of barriers and propose possible solutions to overcome or avoid them: (1) how the current legal framework guiding start and operation of housing co-operatives (mainly the Co-operative Act) influences incentives for engaging in resource-efficient construction, and (2) how the legal instrument for collaboration between developers and consultants incentivises resource-efficient construction. In this case, the contract under investigation is the General Conditions of Contract for Consulting Agreements for Architectural and Engineering Assignments (ABK 09)”. Changes to these two sets of legal and institutional frameworks could have a significant impact on how buildings are designed, produced and used. The changes proposed could incentivise construction industry actors to fully pursue the creation of smart, sustainable buildings that deliver services to users and reduce negative environmental impacts stemming from both the building construction and operation phases.

Abstract [sv]

Byggnader och byggande i den industrialiserade delen av världen står för nästan 40 procent av den globala energianvändningen, och därmed även en liknande procent av de globala koldioxidutsläppen. Tyvärr fortsätter energibehovet och kopplade utsläpp från sektorn att växa. Därför är det av största vikt att stimulera användningen av resurseffektiv teknik  i byggnader för att minska kostnaderna, för att nå energi- och klimatmål och för att möjliggöra smarta och hållbara byggnader och städer i större skala. Eftersom ny teknik medför risker samtidigt som fördelar måste byggherrar, entreprenörer och konsulter ha incitament för att minska och dela dessa risker på ett rationellt sätt, om vi ska uppfylla de avgörande långsiktiga målen i samhället för minskad användning av resurser och minskade utsläpp. Hypotesen i denna avhandling är att det finns lagliga och institutionella ramverk (lagar, regler, byggnormer, förordningar, standardkontrakt osv.) som resulterar i svaga eller negativa incitament för aktörer i byggindustrins att investera i, föreslå och installera resurseffektiv teknik. Om hypotesen stämmer är målet att identifiera sätt att stimulera aktörer i byggindustrins att fullt ut engagera sig i design och produktion av smarta och hållbara byggnader. För att studera dessa frågeställningar har fyra studier genomförts, och ett brett metodupplägg har använts (mixed method approach).  I artikel 1 identifieras 38 hinder för energieffektivisering i svenska flerbostadshus. Nästa studie (artikel 2) utvecklar ett kategoriseringsramerk för hinder relaterat till energieffektivitet. Artikel 3 och 4 ägnas åt två specifika hinder och föreslår möjliga lösningar för att övervinna eller runda dessa: (1) hur det nuvarande legala ramverket (främst bostadsrättsformen) som styr start och drift av bostadsrättsföreningar påverkar incitament för att uppföra resurseffektiva byggnader, och (2) hur det institutionella ramverket för samarbete mellan byggherre/entreprenör och konsulter stimulerar resurseffektiv konstruktion. I detta fall är det undersökta ramverket standardavtalet ”Allmänna bestämmelser för konsultuppdrag inom arkitekt- och ingenjörsverksamhet ABK 09”. Dessa två uppsättningar av legala och institutionella ramverk kan, om de ändras, ha en betydande inverkan på hur byggnader designas, produceras och används. De föreslagna förändringarna kan leda till möjligheter att stimulera aktörer i byggindustrin att fullt ut engagera sig i att skapandet av smarta och hållbara byggnader; skapandet av byggnader som levererar tjänster till användare och samtidigt minskar negativ miljöpåverkan från både produktion och drift av byggnader.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2020. p. 72
Series
TRITA-ITM-AVL ; 2020:31
Keywords
energy efficiency, resource efficiency, construction industry, building sector, innovation, agreements, common-pool resources, multifamily buildings, Sweden, contract theory, energieffektivisering, resursoptimering, byggindustrin, bostadssektorn, innovation, avtal, allmänningar, flerbostadshus, kontraktsteori, Sverige
National Category
Energy Engineering
Research subject
Energy Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-273752 (URN)978-91-7873-568-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-08-28, https://kth-se.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN__I0rtt4bQt6cAYv6h9BqhQ, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-06-03 Created: 2020-05-27 Last updated: 2023-10-04Bibliographically approved
Holm, C., Anund Vogel, J. & Molinari, M. (2019). GDPR och Smarta Byggnader - En undersökning av teknik, individ och samhälle i framtidens smarta byggnader. Smart Built Environment
Open this publication in new window or tab >>GDPR och Smarta Byggnader - En undersökning av teknik, individ och samhälle i framtidens smarta byggnader
2019 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [sv]

Denna rapports huvudfokus är att undersöka balansen, beskriven ovan, utifrån det rättsliga ramverk som GDPR utgör, samt att ge vägledning för hur kommersiella fastighetsägare rent praktiskt kan arbeta med smarta byggnader. Den pågående trenden att genom sensorer och hantering av data påverka byggnaders resursanvändning och möjligheten till ökad tjänsteleverans kommer med all sannolikhet att fortsätta och öka. Digitaliseringen av samhällsbyggnadssektorn är enbart i sin linda och vinsterna på individ, företags och samhällsnivå, dels ekonomiskt och miljömässigt, bedöms som mycket stora. För att möjliggöra potentialen av digitaliseringen, en minimering av klimatpåverkan kopplat till drift av byggnader, och samtidigt värna om individens integritet måste framtida byggnaders system för insamling och hantering av data designas varsamt. För att möjliggöra optimering av en byggnads tekniska system, samt en minimering av klimatpåverkan kopplat till drift av byggnaden, kan en fastighetsägare behöva samla in och lagra information som faller inom ramen för GDPR. För att säkerställa att fastighetsägaren följer GDPR beskrivet ovan bör följande rutiner och åtgärder genomföras.

  • Rättslig strategi
  • Minimera uppgifter som går att koppla till fysisk person
  • Hur kan man optimera med aggregerade uppgifter som inte kopplas till person
  • Problematisera samtycken, resultatet av det är en rättslig osäker het som leder till att använda anonyma data. Det är inte kopplingen till person som är intressant, utan optimeringen.
  • Problematisera anonymisering, hur gör man rent tekniskt eller sam man utgå ifrån att det är en praktisk variant av anonymisering som gäller eftersom GDPR förslår det?

I den här rapporten vill vi visa hur man kan göra det enkelt att följa GDPR, och enkelt att bygga kommersiella smarta hus i relation till GDPR. Vårt förslag innehåller följande punkter som vi sedan utvecklar nedan.

Data:

  • Minimera lagring av data och maximera momentant utnyttjande av sensordata
  • Höj och förfina optimeringsgraden Minimera uppgifter som går att koppla till fysisk person Pseudonymisera data som måste lagras

Organisation:

  • Ha tydlig organisation och ansvarsfördelning runt hanteringen av data och personuppgifter i relation till GDPR.
  • Alltid ha en aktuell lista på sensorer.
  • Använd opt-out5GDPR OCH SMARTA BYGGNADER.
  • Utarbeta genomarbetade skriftliga samtycken. 
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Smart Built Environment, 2019. p. 38
Keywords
GDPR, Smart Buildings, Law
National Category
Law and Society
Research subject
Real Estate and Construction Management
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-324738 (URN)
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency
Note

QC 20230324

Available from: 2023-03-14 Created: 2023-03-14 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved
Anund Vogel, J., Lind, H. & Holm, C. (2019). Incentivising innovation in the construction sector: the role of consulting contracts. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 19(2), 181-196
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Incentivising innovation in the construction sector: the role of consulting contracts
2019 (English)In: Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, ISSN 1835-6354, E-ISSN 1837-9133, Vol. 19, no 2, p. 181-196Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The issue of whether contracts promote innovation and sustainability is an important but overlooked aspect for achieving energy and environmental targets, as well as for creating smart and sustainable cities. In this article, based on the principle/agent problem and Holmstrom and Milgrom's work on optimal contracts it is argued that the current general conditions of architectural and engineering consulting agreements in Sweden (ABK 09)-a standard type of contract often used in developer/consultant relations-may not incentivize choices that support the long-term goals of society. Furthermore, although this exploratory study specifically analyses a Swedish standard contract, the question of how contractual incentive structures can optimize real-world performance is a general one, and thus the article's findings have general applicability. This exploratory study also points to further research into how contractual structures impact climate-neutral buildings. In this way, Swedish consultants who use ABK 09 are incentivized to include low-risk, well-proven, and widely used technologies in order to minimize risks for themselves. This study contributes to resolving this dilemma by suggesting how ABK 09 could be restructured to change the balance between incentives and risk and incentivize innovation and sustainability. As mentioned above, the current study operates at a theoretical level. It discusses six possible changes that would better align the contract with the societal goals of innovation and sustainability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
UNIV TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY-UTS EPRESS, 2019
Keywords
Contracts, incentives for innovation, construction sector, institutional economics, Sweden, buildings
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-265952 (URN)10.5130/AJCEB.v19i2.6613 (DOI)000500702300005 ()2-s2.0-85076904286 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20200102

Available from: 2020-01-02 Created: 2020-01-02 Last updated: 2022-06-26Bibliographically approved
Anund Vogel, J. & Lind, H. (2017). Att styra allmänningar – en studie av svenska bostadsrättsföreningar. Ekonomisk Debatt (2), 55-66
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Att styra allmänningar – en studie av svenska bostadsrättsföreningar
2017 (Swedish)In: Ekonomisk Debatt, ISSN 0345-2646, no 2, p. 55-66Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [sv]

Det är viktigt i ett samhälle att ha institutioner som bidrar till ett effektivt utnyttjande av resurser. Syftet med denna artikel är att granska den svenska bostadsrättsformen utifrån de kriterier som Elinor Ostrom formulerat rörande vad som bidrar till en effektiv förvaltning av en ”allmänning”. Avslutningsvis presenteras också reformförslag som vi bedömer skulle minska problemen i dagens strukturer, problem som främst sammanhänger med att den som startar föreningen och bygger dess hus inte har något långsiktigt ansvar.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: , 2017
Keywords
Bostadsrättsföreningar, bostadsrättslagen, incitament energieffektivisering
National Category
Economics Construction Management
Research subject
Civil and Architectural Engineering; Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-316949 (URN)
Note

QC 20220905

Available from: 2022-09-01 Created: 2022-09-01 Last updated: 2022-09-05Bibliographically approved
Anund Vogel, J., Lind, H. & Lundqvist, P. (2016). Who is Governing the Commons: Studying Swedish Housing Cooperatives. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(4), 424-444
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Who is Governing the Commons: Studying Swedish Housing Cooperatives
2016 (English)In: Housing, Theory and Society, ISSN 1403-6096, E-ISSN 1651-2278, Vol. 33, no 4, p. 424-444Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study examines current governance structures related to multifamily buildings designed by single actors (developers) and operated in cooperative forms. The study analyses the long-term sustainability of the resource regime of study (multifamily buildings) and inked governance structures by applying Ostrom’s eight design principles for long-term survival of self-organized resource regimes (Common-pool resources or CPR’s). The study also searches for signs of movement towards social innovation and collective action in current governance structures. We argue that the structures governing planning, production and operation of housing cooperatives in Sweden do not fulfil the eight design principles for the long-term survival of the resource regime of study, nor do they encourage movement towards social innovation or collective action. In order to ensure the long-term survival of the resource regime of study and to increase innovation in governance structures, five adjustments are proposed; changes in the structures governing risk/profit distribution, communication, collaboration and information between actors in the Swedish cooperative housing sector.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2016
Keywords
Housing cooperatives, Common-pool resources, Planning, Multifamily buildings, Sweden
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-187894 (URN)10.1080/14036096.2016.1186730 (DOI)000383173100003 ()2-s2.0-84983249298 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20230927

Available from: 2016-05-31 Created: 2016-05-31 Last updated: 2024-03-15Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-2160-6808

Search in DiVA

Show all publications