Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, ISSN 2168-6777, E-ISSN 2168-6785, Vol. 13, no 1, p. 809-826Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Interconnecting power converters (IPCs) are the main elements enabling the interconnection of multiple high-voltage alternating current (HVac) and high-voltage direct current (HVdc) subgrids. To ensure stable operation of the resulting hybrid ac/dc systems, grid-following (GFL) and grid-forming (GFM) controls need to be carefully assigned to individual IPC terminals when using common IPC controls. In contrast, dual-port GFM control imposes a stable voltage on the ac and dc terminals and can be deployed on all IPCs regardless of the network configuration. In this work, we use hybrid ac/dc admittance models, eigenvalue sensitivities, and case studies to analyze and quantify the underlying properties of ac-GFM control, ac-GFL, and dual-port GFM control. Compared to common ac-GFM and ac-GFL controls, dual-port GFM control: 1) renders IPCs dissipative over a much wider range of frequencies and operating points; 2) significantly reduces the sensitivity of IPC small-signal dynamics to operating point changes; and 3) exhibits an improved dynamic response to severe contingencies. Finally, the results are illustrated and validated in an experimental scaled-down point-to-point HVdc system.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2025
Keywords
Grid forming, Voltage control, Hybrid power systems, Grid following, Power system stability, HVDC transmission, Standards, AC/DC, dual port, grid following (GFL), grid forming (GFM), power converters
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-361287 (URN)10.1109/JESTPE.2024.3454992 (DOI)001432971300001 ()2-s2.0-85203496454 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20250317
2025-03-172025-03-172025-03-17Bibliographically approved