Open this publication in new window or tab >>KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Univ Utrecht, Bijvoet Ctr, Fac Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands..
Univ Paul Sabatier, IPBS, F-31062 Toulouse, France..
Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Sloan Kettering Inst, Computat & Syst Biol Program, New York, NY 10065 USA..
Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Sloan Kettering Inst, Computat & Syst Biol Program, New York, NY 10065 USA.;Open Force Field Consortium, La Jolla, CA USA..
KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Max Planck Inst Biophys Chem, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany..
KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Stockholm Univ, Dept Biochem & Biophys, Sci Life Lab, Box 1031, SE-17121 Solna, Sweden..
KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Univ Helsinki, Inst Biotechnol, SF-00100 Helsinki, Finland..
Pompeu Fabra Univ, Hosp del Mar Med Res Inst IMIM, Res Programme Biomed Informat, Barcelona 08002, Spain.;Pompeu Fabra Univ, Dept Expt & Hlth Sci, Barcelona 08002, Spain..
Mol Sci Software Inst, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA..
Univ Oxford, Dept Biochem, Oxford OX1 2JD, England.;Univ Warwick, Sch Life Sci, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.;Univ Warwick, Dept Chem, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England..
Univ Leipzig, Fac Med, Inst Med Phys & Biophys, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany..
Univ Utrecht, Bijvoet Ctr, Fac Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands..
Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England..
KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Show others...
2019 (English)In: Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, ISSN 1549-9596, E-ISSN 1549-960X, Vol. 59, no 10, p. 4093-4099Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Given the need for modern researchers to produce open, reproducible scientific output, the lack of standards and best practices for sharing data and workflows used to produce and analyze molecular dynamics (MD) simulations has become an important issue in the field. There are now multiple well-established packages to perform molecular dynamics simulations, often highly tuned for exploiting specific classes of hardware, each with strong communities surrounding them, but with very limited interoperability/transferability options. Thus, the choice of the software package often dictates the workflow for both simulation production and analysis. The level of detail in documenting the workflows and analysis code varies greatly in published work, hindering reproducibility of the reported results and the ability for other researchers to build on these studies. An increasing number of researchers are motivated to make their data available, but many challenges remain in order to effectively share and reuse simulation data. To discuss these and other issues related to best practices in the field in general, we organized a workshop in November 2018 (https://bioexcel.eu/events/workshop-on-sharing-data-from-molecular-simulations/). Here, we present a brief overview of this workshop and topics discussed. We hope this effort will spark further conversation in the MD community to pave the way toward more open, interoperable, and reproducible outputs coming from research studies using MD simulations.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AMER CHEMICAL SOC, 2019
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-266543 (URN)10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00665 (DOI)000503918200007 ()31525920 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85073732839 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20200131
2020-01-312020-01-312024-05-20Bibliographically approved