Open this publication in new window or tab >>Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Kbo-Inn-Salzach-Klinikum Gemeinnützige GmbH, Wasserburg Am Inn, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn and DZNE Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany.
Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE E.V.), Ulm, Germany.
Rostock University Medical Center and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.
Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn and DZNE Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Clinic Leipzig, and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, and DZNE, Goettingen, Germany; Neurosciences and Signaling Group, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany; Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Protein Science, Affinity Proteomics. KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Protein Science, Affinity Proteomics. KTH, Centres, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 15, no 1, article id 668Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Accurate diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases require reliable biomarkers. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins are promising candidates for reflecting brain pathology; however, their diagnostic utility may be compromised by natural variability between individuals, weakening their association with disease. Here, we measured the levels of 69 pre-selected proteins in cerebrospinal fluid using antibody-based suspension bead array technology in a multi-disease cohort of 499 individuals with neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasias, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), corticobasal syndrome, primary supranuclear palsy, along with healthy controls. We identify significant inter-individual variability in overall CSF levels of brain-derived proteins, which could not be attributed to specific disease associations. Using linear modelling, we show that adjusting for median CSF levels of brain-derived proteins increases the diagnostic accuracy of proteins previously identified as altered in CSF in the context of neurodegenerative disorders. We further demonstrate a simplified approach for the adjustment using pairs of correlated proteins with opposite alteration in the diseases. With this approach, the proteins adjust for each other and further increase the biomarker performance through additive effect. When comparing the diseases, two proteins—neurofilament medium and myelin basic protein—showed increased levels in ALS compared to other diseases, and neurogranin showed a specific increase in AD. Several other proteins showed similar trends across the studied diseases, indicating that these proteins likely reflect shared processes related to neurodegeneration. Overall, our findings suggest that accounting for inter-individual variability is crucial in future studies to improve the identification and performance of relevant biomarkers. Importantly, we highlight the need for multi-disease studies to identify disease-specific biomarkers.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2025
Keywords
Affinity proteomics, Biomarker, Cerebrospinal fluid, Inter-individual variability, Multi-disease, Neurodegeneration
National Category
Neurosciences Neurology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-358415 (URN)10.1038/s41598-024-83281-y (DOI)001390118900033 ()39753643 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85214023835 (Scopus ID)
Note
QC 20250117
2025-01-152025-01-152025-01-30Bibliographically approved