kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Modelling aspects to predict failure of a bolt-anchored fibre reinforced shotcrete lining
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8375-581X
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2594-4107
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8336-1247
2018 (English)In: 8th International Symposium on Sprayed Concrete: Modern Use of Wet Mix Sprayed Concrete for Undergro­und Support / [ed] Thomas Beck, Synnove A. Myren, Siri Engen, Trondheim, 2018, p. 278-292Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

 Tunnels in hard and jointed rock are normally excavated with an arch shape to enable the rock to carry itself. The arch effect depends on the stability of individual blocks and too high or too low horizontal stresses could cause blocks to be pushed out or to fall down. To prevent this, systematic rock bolting in combination with fibre reinforced sprayed concrete (FRSC) is commonly used to support the rock. To understand the failure mechanism of the lining when subjected to the load from one block is therefore important for the design. In this paper, the three main failure mechanisms for a rock support shotcrete lining has been identified as failure in the fibre reinforced concrete, bond failure between shotcrete and rock or failure of rock bolts. For each of the failure modes, a short review of numerical methods is presented followed by a selection of a preferred modelling approach. The selected methods are then verified against experimental results from the literature. The selected methods all shows good agreements with tests and demonstrates the ability to simulate each failure mode one by one.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Trondheim, 2018. p. 278-292
Keywords [en]
Failure, Shotcrete, Fibre-reinforced, Bond, Rock-bolt, Tunnel lining
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Research subject
Civil and Architectural Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-232683ISBN: 978-82-8208-060-6 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-232683DiVA, id: diva2:1235902
Conference
Sprayed Concrete 2018
Funder
Rock Engineering Research Foundation (BeFo)
Note

QC 20180730

Available from: 2018-07-30 Created: 2018-07-30 Last updated: 2024-03-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Proceedings

Authority records

Sjölander, AndreasHellgren, RikardAnsell, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjölander, AndreasHellgren, RikardAnsell, Anders
By organisation
Concrete Structures
Infrastructure Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 180 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf