kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Multiobjective Optimization Applied to Maintenance Policy for Electrical Networks
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Electromagnetic Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2964-7233
Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto.
Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto.
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Electromagnetic Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4763-9429
2007 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, ISSN 0885-8950, E-ISSN 1558-0679, Vol. 22, no 4, p. 1675-1682Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A major goal for managers of electric power networks is maximum asset performance. Minimal life cycle cost and maintenance optimization becomes crucial in reaching this goal, while meeting demands from customers and regulators. This necessitates the determination of the optimal balance between preventive and corrective maintenance in order to obtain the lowest total cost.

The approach of this paper is to study the problem of balance between preventive and corrective maintenance as a multiobjective optimization problem, with customer interruptions on one hand and the maintenance budget of the network operator on the other. The problem is solved with meta-heuristics developed for the specific problem, in conjunction with an evolutionary particle swarm optimization algorithm.

The maintenance optimization is applied in a case study to an urban distribution system in Stockholm, Sweden. Despite a general decreased level of maintenance (lower total maintenance cost), better network performance can be offered to the customers. This is achieved by focusing the preventive maintenance on components with a high potential for improvements. Besides this, this paper displays the value of introducing more maintenance alternatives for every component and choosing the right level of maintenance for the components with respect to network performance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 22, no 4, p. 1675-1682
Keywords [en]
asset management; component reliability importance; maintenance; multiobjective optimization; power distribution systems
National Category
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-8167DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.908468ISI: 000250559200030Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-36348973029OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-8167DiVA, id: diva2:13418
Note
QC 20100810Available from: 2008-04-03 Created: 2008-04-03 Last updated: 2022-06-26Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Maintenance optimization for power distribution systems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Maintenance optimization for power distribution systems
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

Maximum asset performance is one of the major goals for electric power distribution system operators (DSOs). To reach this goal minimal life cycle cost and maintenance optimization become crucial while meeting demands from customers and regulators. One of the fundamental objectives is therefore to relate maintenance and reliability in an efficient and effective way. Furthermore, this necessitates the determination of the optimal balance between pre¬ventive and corrective maintenance, which is the main problem addressed in the thesis.

The balance between preventive and corrective maintenance is approached as a multiobjective optimization problem, with the customer interruption costs on one hand and the maintenance budget of the DSO on the other. Solutions are obtained with meta-heuristics, developed for the specific problem, as well as with an Evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. The methods deliver a Pareto border, a set of several solutions, which the operator can choose between, depending on preferences. The optimization is built on component reliability importance indices, developed specifically for power systems. One vital aspect of the indices is that they work with several supply and load points simultaneously, addressing the multistate-reliability of power systems. For the computation of the indices both analytical and simulation based techniques are used. The indices constitute the connection between component reliability performance and system performance and so enable the maintenance optimization.

The developed methods have been tested and improved in two case studies, based on real systems and data, proving the methods’ usefulness and showing that they are ready to be applied to power distribution systems. It is in addition noted that the methods could, with some modifications, be applied to other types of infrastructures. However, in order to perform the optimization, a reliability model of the studied power system is required, as well as estimates on effects of maintenance actions (changes in failure rate) and their related costs. Given this, a generally decreased level of total maintenance cost and a better system reliability performance can be given to the DSO and customers respectively. This is achieved by focusing the preventive maintenance to components with a high potential for improvement from system perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH, 2008. p. vii, 56
Series
Trita-EE, ISSN 1653-5146 ; 2008:012
Keywords
Reliability Importance Index, Multiobjective Optimization, Maintenance Optimization, Asset Management, Customer Interruption Cost, Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM), Reliability Centered Asset Management (RCAM), Monte Carlo Simulation, Evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization.
National Category
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-4686 (URN)978-91-628-7464-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-04-18, D3, D, Lindstedsv. 5, Stockholm, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Note
QC 20100810Available from: 2008-04-03 Created: 2008-04-03 Last updated: 2022-06-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Bertling, Lina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hilber, PatrikBertling, Lina
By organisation
Electromagnetic Engineering
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1021 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf