kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the spectral coexistence of GSO and NGSO FSS systems: power control mechanisms and a methodology for inter-site distance determination
University of Luxembourg.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2298-6774
2016 (English)In: International Journal of Satellite Communications And Networking, ISSN 1542-0973, E-ISSN 1542-0981, Vol. 35, p. 443-459Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The coexistence of geostationary satellite orbit (GSO) and non-GSO (NGSO) fixed satellite service systems withinthe same spectrum to enhance the spectrum efficiency in Ka band has attracted many interests lately. However,the coexistence of GSO-NGSO satellite systems with limited shared spectrum can cause in-line interference froma satellite to other satellite’s earth terminals. In this context, this contribution investigates three possible powercontrol approaches to mitigate the in-line interference caused by an NGSO satellite to the GSO earth terminal,while the NGSO satellite is crossing the GSO satellite’s illumination zone. Moreover, three types of interferencemitigation techniques, namely, range-based, traffic-aware, and cognitive power control techniques are investigated.Furthermore, to increase the spectrum efficiency of the GSO-NGSO fixed satellite service terrestrial network, weformulate and solve an optimization problem with the objective of minimizing the inter-site distance between earthuser-terminals. More specifically, we find the minimum distance from a GSO earth terminal, where an NGSOearth terminal can be implemented subject to minimizing received interference level at the victim system. Finally,our comparative results show that the cognitive power control technique performs the best in protecting the victimreceiver from the in-line interference.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2016. Vol. 35, p. 443-459
Keywords [en]
Cognitive power control, range-based power control, traffic-aware power control, inter-site distance, interference mitigation, GSO, NGSO
National Category
Signal Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-258992DOI: 10.1002/sat.1199ISI: 000411328500004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85006102538OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-258992DiVA, id: diva2:1350471
Note

QC 20191028

Available from: 2019-09-11 Created: 2019-09-11 Last updated: 2024-03-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ottersten, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ottersten, Björn
In the same journal
International Journal of Satellite Communications And Networking
Signal Processing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 70 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf