kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Disciplinary Differences in Academics’ Perceptions of Performance Measurement at Nordic Universities
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning, Learning in Stem.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4280-9866
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning, Learning in Stem.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2983-5573
2020 (English)In: Higher Education Governance & Policy, ISSN 2717-8676, Vol. 1, no 1, p. 18-31Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

As performance measurement has become increasingly common at Nordic universities, concerns have been raised that disciplinary differences create difficulties in comparing academic performances. To better understand the potential of utilising performance measures for the management of academic work, this study explores how academics perceive governance and steering based on performance measurement. Building on an established typology of the disciplines that distinguishes the hard sciences from the soft and the applied sciences from the pure, we ask how academics perceive performance measurement depending on their disciplinary affiliation. The empirical material consists of a survey sent to academics in four Nordic countries. Our results show there are clear differences in the attitudes toward performance measurement between academics from different disciplines. Academics from the hard applied sciences are more positive about performance measurement than any other group, and academics from the soft pure sciences are more negative. These findings are consistent with notions about the poor adaptation of metrics to publication practices within the soft sciences and greater sensitivity to performance measurement among the applied sciences. The main contribution of the article is to provide empirical data that support the notion that performance measures are accepted to different degrees in different disciplines.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dergipark , 2020. Vol. 1, no 1, p. 18-31
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-279627OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-279627DiVA, id: diva2:1461187
Note

QC 20201223

Available from: 2020-08-26 Created: 2020-08-26 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. A metric culture in academia: The influence of performance measurement on the academic culture of Swedish universities
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A metric culture in academia: The influence of performance measurement on the academic culture of Swedish universities
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis studies how the proliferation of performance measurement within Swedish universities has affected the way university actors perceive academic work. The wide diffusion of performance measures in academia is conceptualised as a reflection of changes in the wider societal culture that may be attributed to comprehensive public sector reforms, the globalisation of the higher education sector and novel perspectives and expectations on universities. The result has been an increasing focus on productivity, accountability and competition within universities. To study how this is received by actors within Swedish universities is important because it is likely to have significant consequences for the way academic work is organised and conducted. Therefore, the research question asked in this thesis is how performance measurement influences the understanding of academic work among academics and managers in Swedish universities. This question has been approached through the application of organisational culture theory, which enables an analysis of how university actors collectively perceive the increasing measurement of academic performance. The empirical contribution of the thesis consists of four papers that in different ways explore the role of performance measurement within Swedish universities. The papers discuss academic managers as mediators of meaning, how funding arrangements influence local perceptions of research, subcultural differences in attitudes towards performance measurement and why department heads make use of performance measurement systems. The conclusions of the thesis are that the influence of performance measurement on the understanding of academic work among academics and managers in Swedish universities has affected academic culture in various ways. Some aspects of academic culture have been strengthened and others weakened. The prevalence of performance measures has caused academic work to be increasingly seen through the lens of these measures, which emphasise the importance of displaying a good performance as indicated by the metrics. For most, this is often a matter of minor adaptation, but for some it may imply severe challenges. Although academic performance measures are important tools, used for a variety of purposes, they also pose a challenge to academic culture as the organising principle for academic work.

Abstract [sv]

Den här avhandlingen undersöker hur utbredningen av prestationsmått inom svenska universitet har påverkat hur aktörer inom universiteten uppfattar akademiskt arbete. Den stora spridningen av prestationsmått inom akademin ses som en reflektion av förändringar i en vidare samhällskultur. Dessa förändringar är en konsekvens av omfattande reformer av den offentliga sektorn, globaliseringen av högskolesektorn samt nya perspektiv och förväntningar på universiteten. Följden har blivit ett ökat fokus på produktivitet, ansvarsutkrävande och konkurrens inom universiteten. Att studera hur detta tas emot av aktörer inom svenska universitet är av vikt då det antas ha stor betydelse för hur akademiskt arbete organiseras och utförs. Forskningsfrågan som vägleder avhandlingen är således hur prestationsmätning påverkar förståelsen av akademiskt arbete bland akademiker och ledare inom svenska universitet. För att besvara denna fråga används teorier om organisationskultur, vilket möjliggör en analys av hur aktörer inom universiteten kollektivt uppfattar den ökande mätningen av akademiska prestationer. Avhandlingens empiriska bidrag består av fyra artiklar som på olika sätt undersöker prestationsmåttens roll inom svenska universitet. Artiklarna diskuterar akademiska ledare som medlare av mening, hur forskningsfinansieringens organisering påverkar uppfattningen om forskning inom universiteten, subkulturella skillnader i attityder gentemot prestationsmätning, samt varför institutionsledare använder sig av system för mätning av prestationer inom forskning. Avhandlingens slutsatser är att prestationsmåtten påverkar hur akademiskt arbete uppfattas av akademiker och ledare inom svenska universitet, vilket också förändrar den akademiska kulturen på olika vis. Vissa delar av den akademiska kulturen stärks av prestationsmåtten, medan andra försvagas. Förekomsten av prestationsmått har lett till att akademiskt arbete i ökande grad betraktas i ljuset av dessa mått, vilket understryker vikten av att uppvisa goda prestationer, så som det definieras av måtten. För de flesta innebär detta endast mindre anpassningar, men för vissa grupper kan det innebära betydande utmaningar. Trots att akademiska prestationsmått utgör viktiga verktyg för ett flertal ändamål så utgör de således också en utmaning för den akademiska kulturen som organisationsprincip för akademiskt arbete.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, 2020. p. 187
Series
TRITA-ITM-AVL ; 35
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Technology and Learning
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-279630 (URN)978-91-7873-614-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-09-25, https://kth-se.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_geWu3bMPSiK3tFs1Npl0cA, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-09-01 Created: 2020-08-26 Last updated: 2022-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/hegp/issue/55277/758741

Authority records

Söderlind, JohanGeschwind, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderlind, JohanGeschwind, Lars
By organisation
Learning in Stem
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 185 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf