kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk Measurement Principles
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mathematics (Dept.), Mathematical Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9210-121X
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Mathematics (Dept.).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0775-9680
2012 (English)In: Risk and Portfolio Analysis, Springer Nature , 2012, p. 159-194Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In this chapter, we take a close look at the principles of risk measurement. We argue that it is natural to quantify the riskiness of a position in monetary units so that the measurement of the risk of a position can be interpreted as the size of buffer capital that should be added to the position to provide a sufficient protection against undesirable outcomes. In the investment problems in Chap. 4, variance was used to quantify the riskiness of a portfolio. However, variance, being just the expected squared deviation from the mean value, does not differentiate between good positive deviations and bad negative deviations and cannot easily be translated into meaningful monetary values unless the future value we consider is close to normally distributed. The risk premium considered in Chap. 5 is more natural than the variance as a summary of the riskiness and potential reward of a position. However, the risk premium is difficult to use effectively to control the risk taking of a financial institution or to determine whether the aggregate position of a company or business unit is acceptable from a risk perspective. In this chapter, we will present measures of risk, including the widely used value-at-risk and expected shortfall, analyze their properties, and evaluate their performance in a large number of examples. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2012. p. 159-194
Series
Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering book series (ORFE)
Keywords [en]
Call Option, Credit Default Swap, Implied Volatility, Quantile Function, Risk Measure
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-292727DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4103-8_6Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85098211881OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-292727DiVA, id: diva2:1543818
Note

QC 20210413

Available from: 2021-04-13 Created: 2021-04-13 Last updated: 2022-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hult, HenrikLindskog, Filip

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hult, HenrikLindskog, Filip
By organisation
Mathematical StatisticsMathematics (Dept.)
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 62 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf