kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Application of multi-agent decision-making methods in hydrological ecosystem services management
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering, Water and Environmental Engineering. School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6284-1062
Department of System Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Department of Engineering System and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
2023 (English)In: MethodsX, ISSN 1258-780X, E-ISSN 2215-0161, Vol. 10, article id 102130Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper, a methodology is presented for managing hydrological ecosystem services by taking into account the hierarchy of stakeholders involved in the decision-making process. With this in mind, a water allocation model is first used for allocating water resources to demands. Then, several ecosystem services (ESs)-based criteria are defined to evaluate hydrological ESs of water resources management policies. A set of water and environmental resources management strategies (alternatives) are defined for decision-makers, and several drought management strategies are determined to decrease the area of key crops and water demands of agricultural nodes. To model a multi-agent multi-criteria decision-making problem for managing hydrological ESs, three main steps are considered as follows: • Different ES-based criteria (i.e., economic profit, NPP,1 and ecological index) are defined, and their grade-based values are estimated. • Several strategies are defined for stakeholders at different levels. • A recursive evidential reasoning (ER) approach, which considers a hierarchical structure for decision-makers and a leader-follower game, is used to select the best strategy for each decision-maker.The applicability and efficiency of the methodology are illustrated by applying it to a real-world case study. The methodology is general and can be easily applied to other study areas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2023. Vol. 10, article id 102130
Keywords [en]
Ecosystem services-based criteria, Evidential reasoning, Group decision-making, Hierarchical structure of stakeholders, Water resources management scenarios
National Category
Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-330917DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102130ISI: 000990690300001PubMedID: 37077892Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85152261331OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-330917DiVA, id: diva2:1779693
Note

QC 20230704

Available from: 2023-07-04 Created: 2023-07-04 Last updated: 2023-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Behboudian, Massoud

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Behboudian, MassoudKerachian, Reza
By organisation
Water and Environmental Engineering
In the same journal
MethodsX
Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 180 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf