kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Design and analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced and floating column-supported embankments
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Soil and Rock Mechanics. The University of Tokyo; School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9937-3442
2021 (English)In: International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ISSN 1938-6362, E-ISSN 1939-7879, Vol. 16, no 10, p. 1276-1292Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported system is an economic and effective solution to support embankments constructed on soft soils. In this solution, both end-bearing and floating columns are commonly used in practice. For deep soil foundation depths, floating columns are more economical than end-bearing piles. The design of a floating column foundation involves complex soil–structure interactions and there are still no clear uniform guidelines available for the design of embankments supported by floating columns. The main focus of this paper is to present a design method for the geosynthetic-reinforced floating column-supported (GRFCs) embankments. The main features of the proposed method are combining the bearing capacity theory for the floating columns, the arching theory for fill soils, the tensioned membrane theory for the geosynthetic, and considering interaction models between geosynthetic, soil, and piles. Using the proposed method, the influences of the pile geometry, soft clay, geosynthetic, and embankment fills properties were investigated. It was observed that the geosynthetic membrane inclusion enhances the load transfer mechanism and reduces significantly the differential settlements of floating pile-supported embankments. The floating columns with a higher ultimate bearing capacity cause more soil arching. In general, the soil shear strength properties and column geometry (length, diameter, column spacing) have a strong influence on the GRFCs embankment behaviour. Finally, the proposed method is compared with the BS 8006–1 and EBGEO design standards considering several experimental and numerical models to investigate its validity. The results showed that the proposed method is able of very good prediction performance and allows conducting the design optimization of GRFCs embankment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa UK Limited , 2021. Vol. 16, no 10, p. 1276-1292
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology Materials Engineering
Research subject
Civil and Architectural Engineering; Applied and Computational Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-349226DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2021.1997209ISI: 000713059300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85118428359OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-349226DiVA, id: diva2:1880122
Note

QC 20240701

Available from: 2024-06-30 Created: 2024-06-30 Last updated: 2025-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pham, Tuan A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pham, Tuan A.
By organisation
Soil and Rock Mechanics
In the same journal
International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering GeologyMaterials Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf