kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments − 3D discrete numerical analyses of the interaction and mobilization mechanisms
School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo-Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9937-3442
2021 (English)In: Engineering structures, ISSN 0141-0296, E-ISSN 1873-7323, Vol. 242, p. 112337-112337, article id 112337Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Three-dimensional numerical analyses using the discrete element method are conducted to investigate several fundamental aspects related to soil-structure interaction and mobilization mechanisms in the geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankments. The contributions of the soil arching, tensioned membrane effect, friction interaction, subsoil support, and punching failure are investigated. The results indicated that the inclusion of the geosynthetic enhances the stress transfer from the subsoil to piles due to the tensioned membrane action, and the stress distribution is more uniform as compared to piled embankment without geosynthetic. However, the tension distribution in geosynthetic is not uniform and the maximum tension occurs near the pile edge. Numerical results also proved that the subsoil provides substantial support and reduces the reinforcement tension while shear stresses are mobilized along the upper and lower sides of soil-geosynthetic interfaces. These mechanisms should be considered in theoretical models to produce a more realistic approach. Finally, ten available design methods are reviewed and compared to the numerical results to assess the performance of analytical models. The results showed that the design method of Pham, CUR 226 design guideline, and EBGEO design standard agree well with the numerical results and are generally better than the results of all other methods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2021. Vol. 242, p. 112337-112337, article id 112337
National Category
Civil Engineering Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Research subject
Applied and Computational Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-349234DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112337ISI: 000663656800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85107128098OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-349234DiVA, id: diva2:1880134
Note

QC 20240701

Available from: 2024-06-30 Created: 2024-06-30 Last updated: 2025-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pham, Tuan A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pham, Tuan A.
In the same journal
Engineering structures
Civil EngineeringGeotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf