kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A digital workflow for assessing lifespan, carbonation, and embodied carbon of reusing concrete in buildings
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sustainable Buildings.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9436-6753
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2949-422X
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1526-9331
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sustainable Buildings.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0615-4505
2024 (English)In: Journal of Building Engineering, E-ISSN 2352-7102, Vol. 96, p. 1-23, article id 110536Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Concrete is the most used construction material, accounting for 8% of global CO2 emissions. Various strategies aim to reduce concrete's embodied carbon, such as using supplementary cementitious materials, utilizing cleaner energy, and carbonation. However, a large potential lies in reusing concrete for new buildings in a Circular Economy, thereby closing material loops and avoiding CO2 emissions.

This study focuses on the reuse of precast concrete elements. We present a digital workflow for assessing reuse by predicting the remaining service life, estimating CO2 uptake by natural carbonation, and calculating the embodied carbon savings of concrete reuse. Both carbonation rates from EN 16757 and our investigation were applied to a case study building.

While EN 16757 rates suggest that most precast elements have reached the end of their service life, our assessment shows that these elements have a sufficient lifespan for reuse. Plaster and coverings significantly delay carbonation and extend service life. During the first service life following EN 16757, carbonation was 19,2 kg CO2/m3, whereas our prediction was 5,4 kg CO2/m3. Moreover, CO2 uptake during service life, including reuse, was less than 6% of the embodied carbon. The climate benefits of reuse greatly exceeded those of carbonation.

Furthermore, carbonation did not have a decisive influence when applying Cut-Off, Distributed, and End-of-Life allocations for assessing embodied carbon of re-used elements in subsequent life cycles. The digital workflow is useful in quickly assessing lifespan, carbonation, and embodied carbon of concrete. It can be leveraged as a decision-making tool when designing for reuse.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 96, p. 1-23, article id 110536
Keywords [en]
concrete, circular economy, carbonation, life cycle assessment, LCA, digital technologies, circular construction, reuse, design for reuse, sustainability, regeneration, sustainable buildings, sustainable construction, corrosion, service life, environmental impacts, IPCC, climate change, allocations, GHG emissions, embodied carbon, CO2 uptake
National Category
Building Technologies Architectural Engineering Construction Management Environmental Engineering Construction Management
Research subject
Architecture; Civil and Architectural Engineering; Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Materials; Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Technology; Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures; Industrial Ecology; Civil and Architectural Engineering, Structural Engineering and Bridges
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-353054DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110536ISI: 001304410400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85202299910OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-353054DiVA, id: diva2:1896861
Projects
ReCreate project
Funder
EU, Horizon Europe, 958200
Note

QC 20240911

Available from: 2024-09-11 Created: 2024-09-11 Last updated: 2025-02-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(9194 kB)114 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 9194 kBChecksum SHA-512
ff9f46471d5abb9fb7f05c76771b2a5a5669d520b32cb9d6c2fe195d00e306326b53675aa17965578683fb235af1fe63ae157b9456ea0275e96f73b865c5cfa4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Dervishaj, ArlindMalmqvist, ToveSilfwerbrand, JohanGudmundsson, Kjartan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dervishaj, ArlindMalmqvist, ToveSilfwerbrand, JohanGudmundsson, Kjartan
By organisation
Sustainable BuildingsSustainable development, Environmental science and EngineeringConcrete Structures
In the same journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Building TechnologiesArchitectural EngineeringConstruction ManagementEnvironmental EngineeringConstruction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 115 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1075 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf