kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Image quality assessments in abdominal CT: Relative importance of dose, iterative reconstruction strength and slice thickness
Linköping Univ, Dept Radiol, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat CM, Linköping, Sweden..
Linköping Univ, Dept Radiol, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat CM, Linköping, Sweden..
Linköping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Dept Med Phys, Linköping, Sweden..
Linköping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat CM, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Dept Med Phys, Linköping, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Radiography, ISSN 1078-8174, E-ISSN 1532-2831, Vol. 30, no 6, p. 1563-1571Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Low contrast resolution in abdominal computed tomography (CT) may be negatively affected by attempts to lower patient doses. Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms play a key role in mitigating this problem. The reconstructed slice thickness also influences image quality. The aim was to assess the interaction and influence of patient dose, slice thickness, and IR strength on image quality in abdominal CT. Method: With a simultaneous acquisition, images at 42 and 98 mAs were obtained in 25 patients. Multiplanar images with slice thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) strengths of 3 (AD3) and 5 (AD5) were reconstructed. Four radiologists evaluated the images in a pairwise manner based on five image criteria. Ordinal logistic regression with mixed effects was used to evaluate the effect of tube load, ADMIRE strength, and slice thickness using the visual grading regression technique. Results: For all assessed image criteria, the regression analysis showed significantly (p < 0.001) higher image quality for AD5, but lower for tube load 42 mAs, and slice thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm, compared to the reference categories of AD3, 98 mAs, and 3 mm, respectively. AD5 at 2 mm was superior to AD3 at 3 mm for all image criteria studied. AD5 1 mm produced inferior image quality for liver parenchyma and overall image quality compared to AD3 3 mm. Interobserver agreement (ICC) ranged from 0.874 to 0.920. Conclusion: ADMIRE 5 at 2 mm slice thickness may allow for further dose reductions due to its superiority when compared to ADMIRE 3 at 3 mm slice thickness. Implications for practice: Combination of thinner slices and higher ADMIRE strength facilitates imaging at low dose.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2024. Vol. 30, no 6, p. 1563-1571
Keywords [en]
Visual grading regression (VGR), Image quality, Slice thickness, Iterative reconstruction, Dose reduction
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-355806DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.060ISI: 001336392500001PubMedID: 39378665Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85205933015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-355806DiVA, id: diva2:1910202
Note

QC 20241104

Available from: 2024-11-04 Created: 2024-11-04 Last updated: 2024-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Smedby, Örjan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Smedby, Örjan
By organisation
Medical Imaging
In the same journal
Radiography
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf