kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative analysis of techno-economic and techno-environmental approach to optimal sizing and dispatch of hybrid solar–battery systems
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Heat and Power Technology.ORCID iD: 0009-0003-8256-5223
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Heat and Power Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4932-7103
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Energy Technology, Heat and Power Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9668-917X
Northvolt AB, 112 47 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0009-0009-0709-4357
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Energy Conversion and Management: X, E-ISSN 2590-1745, Vol. 25, article id 100858Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigates the techno-economic and techno-environmental performance of photovoltaic (PV) solar systems coupled with battery energy storage systems (BESS) in a Swedish context. The research uses mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) to optimise the dispatch strategy, minimising both operational costs and CO2eq emissions. By analysing grid signals, including electricity price and carbon intensity, the study determines the optimal size and operation of PV-BESS. The base case in Sweden was further examined by comparing the system with Italy and Poland, and by testing it with different load demand profiles. Italy and Poland were chosen due to their higher variability in grid price and carbon footprint, respectively, as well as more favourable solar conditions. The industrial and industrial shift profiles were chosen to assess the impact of load profiles with less variability compared to the base case residential profile. The key findings reveal distinct differences between economic and environmental optimisation, impacting system performance and highlighting the need for a balanced approach. Local conditions, such as grid signal volatility and solar PV production, are shown to significantly influence optimal system configurations. In Sweden, the economic approach led to higher system utilisation due to greater price volatility, while the environmental approach prioritised lower emissions. Additionally, the trade-offs between economic and environmental optimisation can lead to cost/environmental footprint increases between 25% and up to several times higher (up to 300 %). The study also finds that reducing the levelised cost of energy (LCOE) or levelised carbon footprint (LCO2eq) from the investor perspective may not always translate into significant end-user benefits. This further highlights the importance of including various stakeholder perspectives in the analysis, especially in the context of decision support. Sensitivity analysis indicates that oversizing the PV system leads to a rapid increase in costs and emissions. The addition of BESS can justify this increase by scaling the Renewable Energy Self-Sufficiency (RESS) value. Furthermore, there are diminishing returns for oversizing the battery. This research is relevant for various stakeholders, including project developers, policymakers, and researchers involved in renewable energy integration. Future research could further refine optimisation strategies for PV-BESS systems by delving deeper into specific aspects such as grid signal analysis and diverse end-of-life (EoL) pathways.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2025. Vol. 25, article id 100858
National Category
Energy Systems
Research subject
Energy Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-358523DOI: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100858ISI: 001405339200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85215417923OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-358523DiVA, id: diva2:1929197
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, N°52022-1
Note

QC 20250212

Available from: 2025-01-20 Created: 2025-01-20 Last updated: 2025-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4680 kB)86 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4680 kBChecksum SHA-512
b73578075211e7c99c9fc8fe76d53b6b317e9c16b91a24392c74a574eb21f665db9d222c3229a5cf1047a94e2c294a764cec53fe373892b7656c52fe3f2964e0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Smajila, LukaTrevisan, SilviaGolzar, FarzinVaidya, KetanGuédez, Rafael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Smajila, LukaTrevisan, SilviaGolzar, FarzinVaidya, KetanGuédez, Rafael
By organisation
Heat and Power Technology
In the same journal
Energy Conversion and Management: X
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 86 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 695 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf