kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Critical state mechanics-based arching model for pile-supported embankments
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Soil and Rock Mechanics. Smart Computing in Civil Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9937-3442
Department of Civil Engineering, Eshragh Institute of Higher Education, Bojnourd, Iran.
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, 3SR, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, The University of Kansas, 66045, Kansas, USA.
2025 (English)In: Geotextiles and Geomembranes, ISSN 0266-1144, E-ISSN 1879-3584, Vol. 53, no 4, p. 909-937Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The study and application of soil arching theory in geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments have gained increasing attention, as accurate arching estimation significantly influences load-deflection behavior of structures. While most existing models rely on Rankine's earth pressure theory, which applies primarily to granular soils and neglects cohesion effects. This paper employs three-dimensional numerical simulations to examine the impact of soil cohesion on soil arching mechanisms in pile-supported embankments. Results indicate that cohesion enhances load transfer to piles, with arching efficacy increasing nonlinearly before stabilizing at higher cohesion values. Building on these findings, the ground reaction curve (GRC) model is proposed to predict arching behavior in both cohesive and non-cohesive embankments at various deformation stages. By integrating critical state soil mechanics with the concentric arch model, the transition between maximum and critical arching states is captured through changes in the mobilized friction angle with relative displacement. Model validation against two well-instrumented case studies demonstrates its accuracy, particularly in accounting for soil cohesion. Moreover, the maximum arching model better predicts GRPS embankments under small deformations (relative displacement <4 %), while the critical arching model is more suitable for large deformations (relative displacement >6 %). The proposed model effectively captures arching behavior improvements in both cohesive and non-cohesive soils.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2025. Vol. 53, no 4, p. 909-937
Keywords [en]
Cohesive soils, Concentric arches model, Critical state mechanics, Ground reaction curve, Pile-supported embankment, Soil arching
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-362035DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.03.002ISI: 001457675900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105000793895OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-362035DiVA, id: diva2:1949708
Note

QC 20250408

Available from: 2025-04-03 Created: 2025-04-03 Last updated: 2025-05-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pham, Tuan A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pham, Tuan A.
By organisation
Soil and Rock Mechanics
In the same journal
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf