kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Anticipatory Technology Ethics Reflection By Eliciting CreativeAI Imaginaries Through Fictional Research Abstracts
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Human Centered Technology, Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0028-9030
Aalto University.
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Human Centered Technology, Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1679-6018
2025 (English)In: The 2025 ACM Conference on Fair-ness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’25), 2025Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

From issues of intellectual property rights, environmental impact,and the question of creativity in itself, Creative AI  (AI applied to arts and design) presents many pressing ethical challenges. At thes ame time, AI ethics guidelines have been criticised for their rationalist inactionability, highlighting the need for finding ground-up approaches for exploring situated ethics and anticipatory – rather than reactive – ethics in AI technology design. In this paper, we present the results of organising two workshops with Creative AI practitioners in writing fictional research abstracts (FRAs). The participants wrote future-oriented research scenarios for Creative AI and engaged in discussion about them, with the aim to critically reflect on Creative AI ethics and futures in an anticipatory manner. In this paper, we provide an analysis of the imaginaries within the abstracts (e.g. stakeholders, technology framing, and scientific study framing in the abstract), as well as a thematic analysis of topics evoked in and by the abstracts. We observe that the FRAs facilitated five different kinds of thematic discussions, of which nature of creativity and role on AI in the society were particularly prevalent. We also witnessed socio-technical continuity that brought current and past conditions as constraints into the future scenarios. We subsequently reflect on how the FRAs engaged with ethical questions using the Anticipatory Technology Ethics perspectives of technology, artefact, and application. Our work contributes to the empirical understanding of the ethical concerns of future Creative AI technologies and their role in society, while extending the empirical insights of applying the FRA method into a situated case of anticipatory ethics reflection.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025.
National Category
Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities and Arts
Research subject
Art, Technology and Design
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-363311DOI: 10.1145/3715275.3732011OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-363311DiVA, id: diva2:1957847
Conference
ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2025), Athens, Greece, June 23-26, 2025
Available from: 2025-05-13 Created: 2025-05-13 Last updated: 2025-05-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Jääskeläinen, PetraHolzapfel, Andre

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jääskeläinen, PetraHolzapfel, Andre
By organisation
Media Technology and Interaction Design, MID
Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities and Arts

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf