Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.). Örebro University, Sweden .ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1292-8239
2016 (English)In: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 106, no 1, p. 143-162Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

We take up the issue of performance differences between male and female researchers, and investigate the change of performance differences during the early career. In a previous paper it was shown that among starting researchers gendered performance differences seem small to non-existent (Van Arensbergen et al. 2012). If the differences do not occur in the early career anymore, they may emerge in a later period, or may remain absent. In this paper we use the same sample of male and female researchers, but now compare performance levels about 10 years later. We use various performance indicators: full/fractional counted productivity, citation impact, and relative citation impact in terms of the share of papers in the top 10 % highly cited papers. After the 10 years period, productivity of male researchers has grown faster than of female researcher, but the field normalized (relative) citation impact indicators of male and female researchers remain about equal. Furthermore, performance data do explain to a certain extent why male careers in our sample develop much faster than female researchers' careers; but controlling for performance differences, we find that gender is an important determinant too. Consequently, the process of hiring academic staff still remains biased.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016. Vol. 106, no 1, p. 143-162
Keywords [en]
Gender bias, Academic careers, Performance differences, Longitudinal study
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-182877DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1775-3ISI: 000368075800009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84954397574OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-182877DiVA, id: diva2:906414
Note

QC 20160224

Available from: 2016-02-24 Created: 2016-02-23 Last updated: 2018-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Sandström, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Ulf
By organisation
Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.)
In the same journal
Scientometrics
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 181 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf