Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Better faulty than sorry: Investigating social recovery strategies to minimize the impact of failure in human-robot interaction
KTH, Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), Robotik, perception och lärande, RPL.
KTH, Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), Robotik, perception och lärande, RPL.
KTH, Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), Robotik, perception och lärande, RPL.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-2212-4325
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: WCIHAI 2017 Workshop on Conversational Interruptions in Human-Agent Interactions: Proceedings of the first Workshop on Conversational Interruptions in Human-Agent Interactions co-located with 17th International Conference on International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2017) Stockholm, Sweden, August 27, 2017., CEUR-WS , 2017, Vol. 1943, s. 19-27Konferansepaper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Failure happens in most social interactions, possibly even more so in interactions between a robot and a human. This paper investigates different failure recovery strategies that robots can employ to minimize the negative effect on people's perception of the robot. A between-subject Wizard-of-Oz experiment with 33 participants was conducted in a scenario where a robot and a human play a collaborative game. The interaction was mainly speech-based and controlled failures were introduced at specific moments. Three types of recovery strategies were investigated, one in each experimental condition: ignore (the robot ignores that a failure has occurred and moves on with the task), apology (the robot apologizes for failing and moves on) and problem-solving (the robot tries to solve the problem with the help of the human). Our results show that the apology-based strategy scored the lowest on measures such as likeability and perceived intelligence, and that the ignore strategy lead to better perceptions of perceived intelligence and animacy than the employed recovery strategies.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
CEUR-WS , 2017. Vol. 1943, s. 19-27
Serie
CEUR Workshop Proceedings, ISSN 1613-0073 ; 1943
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-217595Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85032453885OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-217595DiVA, id: diva2:1157130
Konferanse
1st Workshop on Conversational Interruptions in Human-Agent Interactions, WCIHAI 2017, Stockholm, Sweden, 27 August 2017
Merknad

QC 20171115

Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-11-15 Laget: 2017-11-15 Sist oppdatert: 2024-03-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Scopus

Person

Leite, Iolanda

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Engelhardt, SaraHansson, EmmeliLeite, Iolanda
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 753 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf