Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Authenticity in Bioethics: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice
Filosofi och historia, KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria, Filosofi.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1456-4352
2019 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this doctoral thesis is to bridge the gap between theoretical ideals of authenticity and practical authenticity-related problems in healthcare. In this context, authenticity means being "genuine," "real," "true to oneself," or similar, and is assumed to be closely connected to the autonomy of persons. The thesis includes an introduction and four articles related to authenticity. The first article collects various theories intended to explain the distinction between authenticity and inauthenticity in a taxonomy that enables oversight and analysis. It is argued that (in-)authenticity is difficult to observe in others. The second article offers a solution to this difficulty in one theory of authenticity. It is proposed that under certain circumstances, it is morally justified to judge that the desires underlying a person's decisions are inauthentic. The third article incorporates this proposition into an already established theory of personal autonomy. It is argued that the resulting conceptualization of autonomy is fruitful for action-guidance in authenticity-related problems in healthcare. The fourth article collects nine cases of possible authenticity-related problems in healthcare. The theory developed in the third article is applied to the problems, when this is allowed by the case-description, to provide guidance with regard to them. It is argued that there is not one universal authenticity-related problem but many different problems, and that there is thus likely not one universal solution to such problems but various particular solutions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2019. , s. 147
Serie
Theses in philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, ISSN 1650-8831 ; 62
Emneord [en]
Authenticity, autonomy, decision-making, healthcare, paternalism, informed consent, bioethics
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-244301ISBN: 978-91-7873-124-4 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-244301DiVA, id: diva2:1289625
Disputas
2019-06-10, Kollegiesalen, Brinellvägen 8, Stockholm, 13:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council, 2014–4024Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2014–4024Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-03-21 Laget: 2019-02-18 Sist oppdatert: 2019-03-21bibliografisk kontrollert
Delarbeid
1. The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Medicine, Health care and Philosophy, ISSN 1386-7423, E-ISSN 1572-8633Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

It is sometimes argued that autonomous decision-making requires that the decision-maker’s desires are authentic, i.e., “genuine,” “truly her own,” “not out of character,” or similar. In this article, it is argued that a method to reliably determine the authenticity (or inauthenticity) of a desire cannot be developed. A taxonomy of characteristics displayed by different theories of authenticity is introduced and applied to evaluate such theories categorically, in contrast to the prior approach of treating them individually. The conclusion is drawn that, in practice, the authenticity of desires cannot be reliably determined. It is suggested that authenticity should therefore not be employed in informed consent practices in healthcare.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer, 2017
Emneord
Authenticity, Autonomy, Informed consent, Decision-making, Healthcare
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-208635 (URN)10.1007/s11019-017-9783-0 (DOI)000425299900006 ()2-s2.0-85020429439 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council, 2014–4024
Merknad

QC 20170612

Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-06-09 Laget: 2017-06-09 Sist oppdatert: 2019-02-18bibliografisk kontrollert
2. What Justifies Judgments of Inauthenticity?
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>What Justifies Judgments of Inauthenticity?
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: HEC Forum, ISSN 0956-2737, E-ISSN 1572-8498Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The notion of authenticity, i.e., being “genuine,” “real,” or “true to oneself,” is sometimes held as critical to a person’s autonomy, so that inauthenticity prevents the person from making autonomous decisions or leading an autonomous life. It has been pointed out that authenticity is difficult to observe in others. Therefore, judgments of inauthenticity have been found inadequate to underpin paternalistic interventions, among other things. This article delineates what justifies judgments of inauthenticity. It is argued that for persons who wish to live according to the prevailing social and moral standards and desires that are seriously undesirable according to those standards, it is justified to judge that a desire is inauthentic to the extent that it is due to causal factors that are alien to the person and to the extent that it deviates from the person’s practical identity. The article contributes to a tradition of thinking about authenticity which is known mainly from Frankfurt and Dworkin, and bridges the gap between theoretical ideals of authenticity and real authenticity-related problems in practical biomedical settings.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer, 2018
Emneord
Authenticity, Autonomy, Decision-making, Paternalism, Bioethics
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-233506 (URN)10.1007/s10730-018-9356-5 (DOI)000452209200004 ()2-s2.0-85049565770 (Scopus ID)
Merknad

QC 20180822

Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-08-21 Laget: 2018-08-21 Sist oppdatert: 2019-07-15bibliografisk kontrollert
3. A non-ideal authenticity-based conceptualization of personal autonomy
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>A non-ideal authenticity-based conceptualization of personal autonomy
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Medicine, Health care and Philosophy, ISSN 1386-7423, E-ISSN 1572-8633Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Respect for autonomy is a central moral principle in bioethics. The concept of autonomy can be construed in various ways. Under the non-ideal conceptualization proposed by Beauchamp and Childress, everyday choices of generally competent persons are autonomous to the extent that they are intentional and are made with understanding and without controlling influences. It is sometimes suggested that authenticity is important to personal autonomy, so that inauthenticity prevents otherwise autonomous persons from making autonomous decisions. Building from Beauchamp and Childress’s theory, this article develops a non-ideal authenticity-based conceptualization of personal autonomy. Factors that indicate inauthentic decision-making are explicated, and the full concept is defended from three expected objections. The theory is then tested on a paradigm case which has concerned theorists and practitioners for some time, namely the possible inauthenticity of anorexia nervosa patients’ decision-making. It is concluded that the theory seems to be fruitful in analyses of the degree of autonomy of patients’ decision-making, and that it succeeds in providing reliable action-guidance in practical contexts.

Emneord
Autonomy, Authenticity, Anorexia nervosa, Healthcare, Bioethics
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-244298 (URN)10.1007/s11019-018-9879-1 (DOI)000482898400006 ()
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council, 2014–4024Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2014–4024
Merknad

QC 20190218

Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-02-18 Laget: 2019-02-18 Sist oppdatert: 2019-09-17bibliografisk kontrollert
4. Nine Cases of Possible Inauthenticity in Biomedical Contexts and What They Require from Bioethicists
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Nine Cases of Possible Inauthenticity in Biomedical Contexts and What They Require from Bioethicists
(engelsk)Manuskript (preprint) (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Respect for autonomy is a main moral principle in bioethics. It is sometimes argued that authenticity, i.e., being "real," "genuine," "true to oneself," or similar, is crucial to a person's autonomy. This article collects nine cases in which the notion of authenticity has been or could be invoked in biomedical contexts. One recently developed theory aiming to provide normative guidance with regard to authenticity-related problems is applied when it is possible, while it is explained in detail why the theory is inept or impractical in the remaining cases. The article thus provides an overview of authenticity-related problems which may be helpful for autonomy theorists. Furthermore, it is argued that there is no universal problem of authenticity, but many problems, and that they may require various particular solutions rather than one universal solution. Among other things, it is suggested that bioethicists should explore non-ideal methodological approaches to authenticity-related problems to provide action-guidance with regard to them.

Emneord
Authenticity, autonomy, healthcare, bioethics
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-244299 (URN)
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2014–4024Swedish Research Council, 2014–4024
Merknad

QC 20180218

Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-02-18 Laget: 2019-02-18 Sist oppdatert: 2019-02-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(3987 kB)117 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT02.pdfFilstørrelse 3987 kBChecksum SHA-512
ee98af26c465ab872cdf3721de64c17060dd4c083b4af7003d0e4712836fa655c4154f1a148a8b62e5f37d04a6b950480d44856a0631d2a00a6b8705e655bb98
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Personposter BETA

Ahlin Marceta, Jesper

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Ahlin Marceta, Jesper
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 117 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1846 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf