Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Network Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands.;Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Org Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands..
KTH, Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM), Industriell ekonomi och organisation (Inst.).ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1292-8239
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 14, nr 3, artikel-id e0202712Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used to evaluate individual scientists-as is exemplified by the popularity of the many other publication and citation-based indicators used in evaluation. These indicators, however, cover at best some of the quality dimensions relevant for assessing a researcher: productivity and impact. At the same time, research quality has more dimensions than productivity and impact alone. As current bibliometric indicators are not covering various important quality dimensions, we here contribute to developing better indicators for those quality dimensions not yet addressed. One of the quality dimensions lacking valid indicators is an individual researcher's independence. We propose indicators to measure different aspects of independence: two assessing whether a researcher has developed an own collaboration network and two others assessing the level of thematic independence. Taken together they form an independence indicator. We illustrate how these indicators distinguish between researchers that are equally productive and have a considerable impact. The independence indicator is a step forward in evaluating individual scholarly quality.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Public Library of Science , 2019. Vol. 14, nr 3, artikel-id e0202712
Nationell ämneskategori
Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-249879DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202712ISI: 000462465800001PubMedID: 30917110Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85063577996OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-249879DiVA, id: diva2:1306283
Anmärkning

QC 22220190423

Tillgänglig från: 2019-04-23 Skapad: 2019-04-23 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-04-23Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Sandström, Ulf

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Sandström, Ulf
Av organisationen
Industriell ekonomi och organisation (Inst.)
I samma tidskrift
PLoS ONE
Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 134 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf