Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bodily Rights and Property Rights
KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-9984-7831
KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0071-3919
2006 (Engelska)Ingår i: Journal of Medical Ethics, ISSN 0306-6800, E-ISSN 1473-4257, Vol. 32, nr 4, s. 209-214Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Whereas previous discussions on ownership of biological material have been much informed by the natural rights tradition, insufficient attention has been paid to the strand in liberal political theory represented by Felix Cohen, Tony Honore, and others, which treats property relations as socially constructed bundles of rights. In accordance with that tradition, we propose that the primary normative issue is what combination of rights a person should have to a particular item of biological material. Whether that bundle qualifies to be called `` property'' or `` ownership'' is a secondary, terminological issue. We suggest five principles of bodily rights and show how they can be applied to the construction of ethically appropriate bundles of rights to biological material.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2006. Vol. 32, nr 4, s. 209-214
Nyckelord [en]
human tissue, biobanks, commodification, ethics
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-8710DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.011270ISI: 000236406800006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33645759522OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-8710DiVA, id: diva2:14104
Anmärkning
QC 20100708Tillgänglig från: 2008-06-09 Skapad: 2008-06-09 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-14Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Virtue Ethics, Bioethics, and the Ownership of Biological Material
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Virtue Ethics, Bioethics, and the Ownership of Biological Material
2008 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis is to show how some ideas in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics can be interpreted and used as a productive way to approach a number of pressing issues in bioethics. Articles I-II introduce, and endorse, a social constructivist perspective on rights (as opposed to the more traditional natural rights idea). It is investigated if the existence of property-like rights to biological material would include the moral right to commodification and even commercialisation. Articles III-V discuss similar questions and more specifically champion the application of an Aristotelian virtue ethics perspective. The articles are preceded by an introductory essay on some of the central themes in the Nicomachean Ethics. This section also includes a very brief account of what the connection between virtue ethics and a theory of social construction, including rights, could look like. The thesis seeks to show that if read somewhat creatively many of the ideas in the Nicomachean Ethics make for a highly useful approach to modern moral problems. It should be noted, however, that this thesis in no way claims to be an exegetic, or a complete, study of the Nicomachean Ethics.

Article I deals with ownership of biological material from a philosophical, as opposed to a legal, perspective. It is argued that a strand in liberal political theory that treats property relations as socially constructed bundles of rights, as developed by e.g. Felix Cohen and Tony Honoré, is well suited for discussions on ownership of biological material.

Article II investigates which differences in biological material might motivate differences in treatment and ownership rights. The article draws on the social constructivist theory of ownership which was developed in Article I.

Article III employs virtue ethics to explain why it is morally permissible to donate but not to sell organs such as kidneys. It is suggested that the former action will bring the agent closer to a state of human flourishing.

Article IV argues that virtues like philia, justice, beneficence and generosity — traditionally all seen as other-regarding — contain strong self-regarding aspects. The central claim is that these self-regarding aspects of the other-regarding virtues are necessary components of complete virtue and thus that the fully virtuous agent has to act virtuously both in her dealings with herself and others.

Article V applies the ideas that were developed in Article IV to the case of living organ donations to next of kin. It is proposed that such an act, although noble and fine, is supererogatory, rather than obligatory, as the donor is morally entitled to be partial to herself. This argument is made against the backdrop of a discussion on some Aristotelian ideas on philia and partiality.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Stockholm: KTH, 2008. s. viii, 121
Serie
Theses in philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, ISSN 1650-8831
Nyckelord
Biological material, ownership, rights, organ, donation, property, commodification, kidney, virtue ethics, natural rights, transplantation, transplant, social organisation
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-4814 (URN)978-91-7178-993-8 (ISBN)
Disputation
2008-08-27, Sal F3, KTH, Lindstedtsvägen 26, Stockholm, 10:00
Opponent
Handledare
Anmärkning
QC 20100709Tillgänglig från: 2008-06-09 Skapad: 2008-06-09 Senast uppdaterad: 2010-07-09Bibliografiskt granskad
2. Ethical aspects of owning human biological material
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Ethical aspects of owning human biological material
2005 (Engelska)Licentiatavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Stockholm: KTH, 2005. s. viii, 12
Nyckelord
biological material, ownership, rights, organ donation, property, commodification, kidney, virtue ethics, natural rights, transplantation, transplant, social organisation
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-610 (URN)91-7178-144-7 (ISBN)
Presentation
2005-10-12, 00:00 (Engelska)
Anmärkning
QC 20101124Tillgänglig från: 2006-02-07 Skapad: 2006-02-07 Senast uppdaterad: 2010-11-24Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Björkman, Barbro

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Björkman, BarbroHansson, Sven Ove
Av organisationen
Filosofi
I samma tidskrift
Journal of Medical Ethics
Filosofi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 410 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf