kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cooperative Rendezvous of Ground Vehicle and Aerial Vehicle using Model Predictive Control
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Automatic Control. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Centres, ACCESS Linnaeus Centre.
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Automatic Control. KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES), Centres, ACCESS Linnaeus Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1927-1690
2017 (English)In: 2017 IEEE 56TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), IEEE , 2017, p. 2819-2824Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper considers the problem of controlling a fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle and a cooperating unmanned ground vehicle to rendezvous by making the aerial vehicle land on top the ground vehicle. Both vehicles are actively taking part in the control effort, where they coordinate positions and velocities to complete the landing. The rendezvous time and the terminal state are kept free to increase the flexibility of the solution. There are two main challenges with this maneuver. First, the controller must force the system to stay within a safe set such that the aerial vehicle approaches the ground vehicle directly from above. Second, the rendezvous must occur within some finite distance. A model predictive control algorithm is proposed to achieve these objectives. The choice is motivated by recent experimental results showing how the landing safety and efficiency could benefit from including safety margins already in the computation of the control inputs. A controller, which steers the agents towards rendezvous and which indirectly provides safety guarantees through non-convex optimization constraints, is derived. Simulations are provided showing the ability of the controller to plan a safe trajectory online, even under the disturbance of wind gusts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE , 2017. p. 2819-2824
Series
IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, ISSN 0743-1546
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-223866DOI: 10.1109/CDC.2017.8264069ISI: 000424696902117Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85046284814ISBN: 978-1-5090-2873-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-223866DiVA, id: diva2:1187825
Conference
56th IEEE Annual Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2017, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC)Melbourne, Australia, 12 December 2017 through 15 December 2017
Funder
Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
Note

QC 20180306

Available from: 2018-03-06 Created: 2018-03-06 Last updated: 2022-06-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Persson, LinneaWahlberg, Bo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, LinneaWahlberg, Bo
By organisation
Automatic ControlACCESS Linnaeus Centre
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 177 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf