Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793
Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Hlth Med & Appl Sci, Adelaide, SA 5034, Australia..
Univ New South Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Ctr Ecosyst Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia..
Monash Univ, Dept Anat & Dev Biol, Melbourne, Vic 3800, Australia..
Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia..
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Zootaxa, ISSN 1175-5326, E-ISSN 1175-5334, Vol. 4564, no 1, p. 173-197Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The taxonomic status and systematic nomenclature of the Australian dingo remain contentious, resulting in decades of inconsistent applications in the scientific literature and in policy. Prompted by a recent publication calling for dingoes to be considered taxonomically as domestic dogs (Jackson et al. 2017, Zootaxa 4317, 201-224), we review the issues of the taxonomy applied to canids, and summarise the main differences between dingoes and other canids. We conclude that (1) the Australian dingo is a geographically isolated (allopatric) species from all other Canis, and is genetically, phenotypically, ecologically, and behaviourally distinct; and (2) the dingo appears largely devoid of many of the signs of domestication, including surviving largely as a wild animal in Australia for millennia. The case of defining dingo taxonomy provides a quintessential example of the disagreements between species concepts (e.g., biological, phylogenetic, ecological, morphological). Applying the biological species concept sensu stricto to the dingo as suggested by Jackson et al. (2017) and consistently across the Canidae would lead to an aggregation of all Canis populations, implying for example that dogs and wolves are the same species. Such an aggregation would have substantial implications for taxonomic clarity, biological research, and wildlife conservation. Any changes to the current nomen of the dingo (currently Canis dingo Meyer, 1793), must therefore offer a strong, evidence-based argument in favour of it being recognised as a subspecies of Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758, or as Canis familiaris Linnaeus, 1758, and a successful application to the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature - neither of which can be adequately supported. Although there are many species concepts, the sum of the evidence presented in this paper affirms the classification of the dingo as a distinct taxon, namely Canis dingo.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MAGNOLIA PRESS , 2019. Vol. 4564, no 1, p. 173-197
Keywords [en]
dingo, dog, canid, Canidae, domestication, hybridisation, nomenclature, species concept, taxonomy
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-247815DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6ISI: 000460137200006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85062445940OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-247815DiVA, id: diva2:1300891
Note

QC 20190401

Available from: 2019-04-01 Created: 2019-04-01 Last updated: 2019-04-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Savolainen, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Savolainen, PeterCrowther, Mathew S.
By organisation
Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLabGene Technology
In the same journal
Zootaxa
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf