Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ABRF Proteome Informatics Research Group (iPRG) 2016 Study: Inferring Proteoforms from Bottom-up Proteomics Data
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, ISSN 1943-4731, Vol. 29, no 2, p. 39-45Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This report presents the results from the 2016 Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteome Informatics Research Group (iPRG) study on proteoform inference and false discovery rate (FDR) estimation from bottom-up proteomics data. For this study, 3 replicate Q Exactive Orbitrap liquid chromatography-tandom mass spectrometry datasets were generated from each of 4 Escherichia coli samples spiked with different equimolar mixtures of small recombinant proteins selected to mimic pairs of homologous proteins. Participants were given raw data and a sequence file and asked to identify the proteins and provide estimates on the FDR at the proteoform level. As part of this study, we tested a new submission system with a format validator running on a virtual private server (VPS) and allowed methods to be provided as executable R Markdown or IPython Notebooks. The task was perceived as difficult, and only eight unique submissions were received, although those who participated did well with no one method performing best on all samples. However, none of the submissions included a complete Markdown or Notebook, even though examples were provided. Future iPRG studies need to be more successful in promoting and encouraging participation. The VPS and submission validator easily scale to much larger numbers of participants in these types of studies. The unique "ground-truth" dataset for proteoform identification generated for this study is now available to the research community, as are the server-side scripts for validating and managing submissions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
NLM (Medline) , 2018. Vol. 29, no 2, p. 39-45
Keywords [en]
best practice, community study, false discovery rate, inference
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-247210DOI: 10.7171/jbt.18-2902-003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85059915162OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-247210DiVA, id: diva2:1304984
Note

QC 20190415

Available from: 2019-04-15 Created: 2019-04-15 Last updated: 2019-04-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Käll, LukasThe, Matthew

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Käll, LukasThe, Matthew
By organisation
Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 163 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf