Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging, ISSN 1941-9651, E-ISSN 1942-0080, Vol. 3, no 2, p. 179-186Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Methods and Results-Thirty-six patients with normal coronary arteries determined by 320 x 0.5-mm detector row coronary CTA were retrospectively evaluated with customized image postprocessing software to measure Hounsfield Units at 1-mm intervals orthogonal to the artery center line. Linear regression determined correlation between mean Hounsfield Units and distance from the coronary ostium (regression slope defined as the distance gradient G(d)), lumen cross-sectional area (G(a)), and lumen short-axis diameter (G(s)). For each gradient, differences between the 3 coronary arteries were analyzed with ANOVA. Linear regression determined correlations between measured gradients, heart rate, body mass index, and cardiac phase. To determine feasibility in lesions, all 3 gradients were evaluated in 22 consecutive patients with left anterior descending artery lesions >= 50% stenosis. For all 3 coronary arteries in all patients, the gradients G(a) and G(s) were significantly different from zero (P < 0.0001), highly linear (Pearson r values, 0.77 to 0.84), and had no significant difference between the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries (P > 0.503). The distance gradient G(d) demonstrated nonlinearities in a small number of vessels and was significantly smaller in the right coronary artery when compared with the left coronary system (P < 0.001). Gradient variations between cardiac phases, heart rates, body mass index, and readers were low. Gradients in patients with lesions were significantly different (P < 0.021) than in patients considered normal by CTA. Conclusions-Measurement of contrast opacification gradients from temporally uniform coronary CTA demonstrates feasibility and reproducibility in patients with normal coronary arteries. For all patients, the gradients defined with respect to the coronary lumen cross-sectional area and short-axis diameters are highly linear, not significantly influenced by the coronary artery (left anterior descending artery versus left circumflex versus right coronary artery), and have only small variation with respect to patient parameters. Preliminary evaluation of gradients across coronary artery lesions is promising but requires additional study. (Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:179-186.)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010. Vol. 3, no 2, p. 179-186
Keywords [en]
computed tomography; coronary vessels; imaging; atherosclerosis
National Category
Medical Image Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-258838DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.854307ISI: 000275655100009PubMedID: 20044512Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77951934386OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-258838DiVA, id: diva2:1350282
Note

QC 20190913

Available from: 2019-09-11 Created: 2019-09-11 Last updated: 2019-09-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wang, Chunliang
In the same journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Medical Image Processing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf