Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Experimental and theoretical study of swept-wing boundary-layer instabilities. Unsteady crossflow instability
Khristianovich Inst Theoret & Appl Mech, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia..
Khristianovich Inst Theoret & Appl Mech, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia..
Khristianovich Inst Theoret & Appl Mech, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia..
Khristianovich Inst Theoret & Appl Mech, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia..
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Physics of fluids, ISSN 1070-6631, E-ISSN 1089-7666, Vol. 31, no 6, article id 064101Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Extensive combined experimental and theoretical investigations of the linear evolution of unsteady (in general) Cross-Flow (CF) and three-dimensional (3D) Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) instability modes of 3D boundary layers developing on a swept airfoil section have been carried out. CF-instability characteristics are investigated in detail at an angle of attack of -5 degrees when this kind of instability dominates in the laminar-turbulent transition process, while the 3D TS-instability characteristics are studied at an angle of attack of +1.5 degrees when this kind of instability is predominant in the transition process. All experimental results are deeply processed and compared with results of calculations based on several theoretical approaches. For the first time, very good quantitative agreement of all measured and calculated stability characteristics of swept-wing boundary layers is achieved both for unsteady CF- and 3D TS-instability modes for the case of a boundary layer developing on a real swept airfoil. The first part of the present study (this paper) is devoted to the description of the case of CF-dominated transition, while the TS-dominated case will be described in detail in a subsequent second part of this investigation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AMER INST PHYSICS , 2019. Vol. 31, no 6, article id 064101
National Category
Fluid Mechanics and Acoustics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-255496DOI: 10.1063/1.5094609ISI: 000474440800020Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067248795OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-255496DiVA, id: diva2:1352724
Note

QC 20190919

Available from: 2019-09-19 Created: 2019-09-19 Last updated: 2019-09-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Örlü, RamisHanifi, Ardeshir

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Örlü, RamisHanifi, Ardeshir
By organisation
Linné Flow Center, FLOWMechanics
In the same journal
Physics of fluids
Fluid Mechanics and Acoustics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf