Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Identifying important barriers to recruitment of patients in randomised clinical studies using a questionnaire for study personnel
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Neurol, Nobels Vag 6, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden..
Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci, SE-18288 Stockholm, Sweden.;Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, S-90187 Umea, Sweden..
Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci, SE-18288 Stockholm, Sweden..
KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Fastigheter och byggande, Bygg- och fastighetsekonomi. Center for Safety Research.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7606-8771
Vise andre og tillknytning
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Trials, ISSN 1745-6215, E-ISSN 1745-6215, Vol. 20, nr 1, artikkel-id 618Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Many randomised controlled trials (RCT) fail to meet their recruitment goals. Study personnel play a key role in recruitment. The aim of this study was to identify successful strategies that study personnel consider to be important in patient recruitment to RCT. Methods: We constructed a questionnaire based on the literature, discussions with colleagues and our own experience as trialists. The survey was named "What is Important for Making a Study Successful questionnaire" (WIMSS-q). Our target group was the study personnel in the ongoing EFFECTS study. The questionnaire was sent out electronically to all physicians and nurses (n = 148). Success factors and barriers were divided according to patient, centre and study level, respectively. Results: Responses were received from 94% of the study personnel (139/148). The five most important factors at centre level for enhancing recruitment were that the research question was important (97%), a simple procedure for providing information and gaining consent (92%), a highly engaged local principal investigator and research nurse (both 87%), and that study-related follow-ups are practically feasible and possible to coordinate with the clinical follow-up (87%). The most significant barrier at the local centre was lack of time and resources devoted to research (72%). Important patient-related barriers were fear of side effects (35%) and language problems (30%). Conclusions: For recruitment in an RCT to be successful, the research question must be relevant, and the protocol must be simple and easy to implement in the daily routine.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
BMC , 2019. Vol. 20, nr 1, artikkel-id 618
Emneord [en]
Recruitment, Survey, Questionnaire, Randomised controlled trials, RCT
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-266224DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3737-1ISI: 000502747500001PubMedID: 31666093Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85074338079OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-266224DiVA, id: diva2:1383937
Merknad

QC 20200109

Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-01-09 Laget: 2020-01-09 Sist oppdatert: 2020-01-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Näsman, Per

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Näsman, PerLundström, Erik
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Trials

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf