Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ethical aspects of owning human biological material
KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Filosofi och teknikhistoria.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-9984-7831
2005 (Engelska)Licentiatavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Stockholm: KTH , 2005. , s. viii, 12
Nyckelord [en]
biological material, ownership, rights, organ donation, property, commodification, kidney, virtue ethics, natural rights, transplantation, transplant, social organisation
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-610ISBN: 91-7178-144-7 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-610DiVA, id: diva2:14604
Presentation
2005-10-12, 00:00 (Engelska)
Anmärkning
QC 20101124Tillgänglig från: 2006-02-07 Skapad: 2006-02-07 Senast uppdaterad: 2010-11-24Bibliografiskt granskad
Delarbeten
1. Bodily Rights and Property Rights
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Bodily Rights and Property Rights
2006 (Engelska)Ingår i: Journal of Medical Ethics, ISSN 0306-6800, E-ISSN 1473-4257, Vol. 32, nr 4, s. 209-214Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Whereas previous discussions on ownership of biological material have been much informed by the natural rights tradition, insufficient attention has been paid to the strand in liberal political theory represented by Felix Cohen, Tony Honore, and others, which treats property relations as socially constructed bundles of rights. In accordance with that tradition, we propose that the primary normative issue is what combination of rights a person should have to a particular item of biological material. Whether that bundle qualifies to be called `` property'' or `` ownership'' is a secondary, terminological issue. We suggest five principles of bodily rights and show how they can be applied to the construction of ethically appropriate bundles of rights to biological material.

Nyckelord
human tissue, biobanks, commodification, ethics
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-8710 (URN)10.1136/jme.2004.011270 (DOI)000236406800006 ()2-s2.0-33645759522 (Scopus ID)
Anmärkning
QC 20100708Tillgänglig från: 2008-06-09 Skapad: 2008-06-09 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-14Bibliografiskt granskad
2. Different Types, Different Rights: Distinguishing Between Different Perspectives on Ownership of Biological Material
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Different Types, Different Rights: Distinguishing Between Different Perspectives on Ownership of Biological Material
2007 (Engelska)Ingår i: Science and Engineering Ethics, ISSN 1353-3452, E-ISSN 1471-5546, Vol. 13, nr 2, s. 221-233Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Drawing on a social construction theory of ownership in biological material this paper discusses which differences in biological material might motivate differences in treatment and ownership rights. The analysis covers both the perspective of the person from whom the material originates and that of the potential recipient. Seven components of bundles of rights, drawing on the analytical tradition of Tony Honore, and their relationship to various types of biological material are investigated. To exemplify these categories the cases of a heart, a kidney, stem cells and hair are used.

Nyckelord
biological material; rights; ownership; commodification; commercialization; PROPERTY; BIOBANKS; COMMODIFICATION; CREATIONS; ETHICS; TISSUE
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-8711 (URN)10.1007/s11948-007-9005-x (DOI)000249586700008 ()2-s2.0-34548711937 (Scopus ID)
Anmärkning
QC 20100708Tillgänglig från: 2008-06-09 Skapad: 2008-06-09 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-14Bibliografiskt granskad
3. Why We are Not Allowed to Sell that Which We are Encouraged to Donate
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Why We are Not Allowed to Sell that Which We are Encouraged to Donate
2006 (Engelska)Ingår i: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, ISSN 0963-1801, E-ISSN 1469-2147, Vol. 15, nr 1, s. 60-70Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Nyckelord
Analytical Approach; commodification; donor; economics; ethical theory; ethics; Health Care and Public Health; human; morality; organ transplantation; review; transplantation; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Virtues
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-8712 (URN)10.1017/S0963180106060075 (DOI)000234926500007 ()16529308 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-33644910480 (Scopus ID)
Anmärkning
QC 20100708Tillgänglig från: 2008-06-09 Skapad: 2008-06-09 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-14Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(163 kB)747 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 163 kBChecksumma MD5
d5010b556bf5e858dbc1d7f13a0bfa6b413181fd0c288b4b6d02ed8cac84ce7d06cf9b65
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Personposter BETA

Björkman, Barbro

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Björkman, Barbro
Av organisationen
Filosofi och teknikhistoria
Filosofi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 747 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1180 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf