kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Tacit Knowledge in Games: From Validation to Debriefing
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Health Informatics and Logistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1457-8263
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Health Informatics and Logistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1126-3781
2021 (English)In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer Nature , 2021, p. 74-83Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Game sessions consist of three phases: briefing, gameplay, and debriefing, with the latter being considered the most important feature of games. Nevertheless, given that games are considered by many to be more of an artistic form rather than a scientific artifact, a question that rises is: Can game sessions in general and debriefing in particular be analyzed and performed in a rigorous scientific way? In other words, can they be consistently structured, given the different characteristics of games, and can clear criteria on what would constitute a successful game session and debriefing be defined? The answer to these questions is yes. Yet, it remains a challenge to extract the knowledge of experts, which resides to a large extent in the tacit knowledge spectrum. Hence, the aim of this paper is to shed some light in this tacit knowledge possessed by experts and to gain understanding on why certain practices are more prone to success than others as well as bring into the surface other practices that have remained well hidden. In order to accomplish this goal, three rounds of interviews were conducted.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2021. p. 74-83
Keywords [en]
Debriefing, Game sessions, Game validation, Gaming simulation, Computer science, Computers, Gameplay, Important features, Tacit knowledge, Three phasis, Artificial intelligence
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-309679DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72132-9_7Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85107284168OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-309679DiVA, id: diva2:1645057
Conference
50th International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference, ISAGA 2019, Warsaw,26 August- 30 August 2019
Note

Part of proceedings: ISBN 978-3-030-72131-2

QC 20220316

Available from: 2022-03-16 Created: 2022-03-16 Last updated: 2023-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Roungas, BillMeijer, Sebastiaan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Roungas, BillMeijer, Sebastiaan
By organisation
Health Informatics and Logistics
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf