Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Tacit Knowledge in Games: From Validation to Debriefing
KTH, Skolan för kemi, bioteknologi och hälsa (CBH), Medicinteknik och hälsosystem, Hälsoinformatik och logistik.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1457-8263
KTH, Skolan för kemi, bioteknologi och hälsa (CBH), Medicinteknik och hälsosystem, Hälsoinformatik och logistik.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1126-3781
2021 (engelsk)Inngår i: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer Nature , 2021, s. 74-83Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Game sessions consist of three phases: briefing, gameplay, and debriefing, with the latter being considered the most important feature of games. Nevertheless, given that games are considered by many to be more of an artistic form rather than a scientific artifact, a question that rises is: Can game sessions in general and debriefing in particular be analyzed and performed in a rigorous scientific way? In other words, can they be consistently structured, given the different characteristics of games, and can clear criteria on what would constitute a successful game session and debriefing be defined? The answer to these questions is yes. Yet, it remains a challenge to extract the knowledge of experts, which resides to a large extent in the tacit knowledge spectrum. Hence, the aim of this paper is to shed some light in this tacit knowledge possessed by experts and to gain understanding on why certain practices are more prone to success than others as well as bring into the surface other practices that have remained well hidden. In order to accomplish this goal, three rounds of interviews were conducted.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer Nature , 2021. s. 74-83
Emneord [en]
Debriefing, Game sessions, Game validation, Gaming simulation, Computer science, Computers, Gameplay, Important features, Tacit knowledge, Three phasis, Artificial intelligence
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-309679DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72132-9_7Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85107284168OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-309679DiVA, id: diva2:1645057
Konferanse
50th International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference, ISAGA 2019, Warsaw,26 August- 30 August 2019
Merknad

Part of proceedings: ISBN 978-3-030-72131-2

QC 20220316

Tilgjengelig fra: 2022-03-16 Laget: 2022-03-16 Sist oppdatert: 2023-01-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Roungas, BillMeijer, Sebastiaan

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Roungas, BillMeijer, Sebastiaan
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 26 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf