kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Distributed Versus Centralized Sensing in Cell-Free Massive MIMO
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science.ORCID iD: 0009-0008-5318-5711
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Communication Systems, CoS.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1807-1985
TOBB Univ Econ & Technol, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, TR-06560 Ankara, Turkiye..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9059-2799
KTH, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Computer Science, Communication Systems, CoS.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0525-4491
2024 (English)In: IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, ISSN 2162-2337, E-ISSN 2162-2345, Vol. 13, no 12, p. 3345-3349Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This letter investigates single-target detection in an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system, implemented within a cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) setup, based on a cloud radio access network (C-RAN) architecture. Unlike previous centralized approaches where sensing is processed in the central cloud, we propose a distributed approach where sensing partially occurs at the receive access points (APs). We consider two scenarios based on the knowledge available at receive APs: i) fully-informed, with complete access to transmitted signal information, and ii) partly-informed, with access only to transmitted signal statistics. We introduce a maximum a posteriori ratio test detector for both distributed sensing scenarios and assess the signaling load for sensing. The fully-informed scenario's performance aligns with the centralized approach in terms of target detection probability. However, the partly-informed scenario requires an additional 13 dBsm variance on the target's radar cross section (RCS) for a detection probability above 0.9. Distributed sensing significantly reduces signaling load, especially in the partly-informed scenario, achieving a 70% reduction under our system setup.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , 2024. Vol. 13, no 12, p. 3345-3349
Keywords [en]
Sensors, Vectors, Integrated sensing and communication, Detectors, Receivers, Computer architecture, Wireless sensor networks, cell-free massive MIMO, C-RAN, distributed sensing, multi-static sensing
National Category
Communication Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-358612DOI: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3462710ISI: 001375692100004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204444473OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-358612DiVA, id: diva2:1929388
Note

QC 20250120

Available from: 2025-01-20 Created: 2025-01-20 Last updated: 2025-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Zou, QinglinBehdad, ZinatCavdar, Cicek

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zou, QinglinBehdad, ZinatDemir, Ozlem TugfeCavdar, Cicek
By organisation
Computer ScienceCommunication Systems, CoS
In the same journal
IEEE Wireless Communications Letters
Communication Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf