kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Early Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Using Numerical Biomechanical Analysis
Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Vasc Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria..
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Engineering Mechanics.
Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Vasc Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7200-4145
Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Vasc Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0533-3387
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Diagnostics, ISSN 2075-4418, Vol. 15, no 1, article id 25Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: We aimed to predict patient-specific rupture risks and growth behaviors in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients using biomechanical evaluation with finite element analysis to establish an additional AAA repair threshold besides diameter and sex. Methods: A total of 1219 patients treated between 2005 and 2024 (conservative and repaired AAAs) were screened for a pseudo-prospective single-center study. A total of 15 ruptured (rAAA) vs. 15 non-ruptured AAAs (control group) were matched for pre-rupture imaging (first rAAA) and the initial post-rupture imaging (second rAAA) with two images in the asymptomatic control group (first and second control). The matching criteria were as follows: aneurysm diameter, sex, and time period between imagings. The biomechanical properties were analyzed with the finite element method (A4clinicsRE, Vascops GmbH, Graz, Austria). Results: Both groups had the same median aortic diameter of 5.5 cm in the first imaging but had significantly different aneurysm progressions with 6.9 cm (5.5-9.4 cm) in the second rAAA vs. 6.0 cm (5.1-7.3 cm) in the second control group (p = 0.006). The first rAAA, compared to the first control, showed significantly a higher peak wall stress (PWS) (211.8 kPa vs. 180.5 kPa, p = 0.029) and luminal diameter (43.5 mm vs. 35.3 mm; p = 0.016). The second rAAA, compared to the matched second control, showed a significantly higher PWS (281.9 kPa vs. 187.4 kPa, p = 0.002), luminal diameter (58.3 mm vs. 39.7 mm; p = 0.007), PWRR (0.78 vs. 0.49, p = 0.014) and RRED (79.8 vs. 56.5, p = 0.014). The rAAA group showed over-proportional averages, over the observation time, and an increase in PWS (nearly 10x faster in rAAA) and luminal diameter (nearly 4x faster in rAAA) per month. Conclusions: The finite element analysis of biomechanical properties could be used for the early prediction of an increased rupture risk in AAA patients. This was confirmed by matched imaging analyses before and after AAA rupture. Further multicenter data are needed to support these findings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG , 2025. Vol. 15, no 1, article id 25
Keywords [en]
rupture risk, biomechanical analysis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, peak wall stress, finite element analysis
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-359531DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010025ISI: 001393940200001PubMedID: 39795553Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85214450657OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-359531DiVA, id: diva2:1934906
Note

QC 20250205

Available from: 2025-02-05 Created: 2025-02-05 Last updated: 2025-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Gasser, Thomas Christian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gasser, Thomas ChristianEnzmann, Florian K.Gratl, AlexandraWippel, David
By organisation
Engineering Mechanics
In the same journal
Diagnostics
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf