kth.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Deliverable D 3.3 Smart planning: Approaches for simulation with incomplete data
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Transport planning. KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Centres, The KTH Railway Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2654-8173
Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3906-1033
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Transport planning. KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Centres, The KTH Railway Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1597-6738
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Centres, The KTH Railway Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2023-0164
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This document describes approaches for microscopic and macroscopic railway simulations with incomplete data, in particular by comparing simulations where freight trains adhere to the timetable with the case when they are allowed to depart before the scheduled departure time when possible.

The report describes the selected case study along with the setup and simulation process for microscopic and macroscopic simulation for the selected tools RailSys and PROTON. Differences between the tools include how dwell time variation distributions are used and the fact that RailSys requires a workaround to simulate early train departures since it does not accept negative values as initial delays. The process of creating input delay distributions from empirical data is also described and includes downscaling of empirical data to estimate the level of primary delays, and to remove the influence of secondary delays.

Comparing the simulation results it is shown that both for RailSys and PROTON, allowing early freight train departures results in the punctuality being closer to empirical data. Based on the simulations run so far, PROTON has produced results slightly more in line with the empirical data, but this may be explained by differences in the modelling approaches. Further investigation is necessary before final conclusions can be drawn in a comparison between RailSys and PROTON, but the simulation methods seem to correspond satisfactorily.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. , p. 40
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Research subject
Transport Science, Transport Systems; Järnvägsgruppen - Kapacitet
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-362297OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-362297DiVA, id: diva2:1951337
Projects
PLASA 2
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 826151
Note

The dissemination level of the report is Confidential, i.e. only for members of the consortium (including Commission Services).

QC 20250414

Available from: 2025-04-10 Created: 2025-04-10 Last updated: 2025-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Johansson, IngridBohlin, MarkusSipilä, HansWarg, Jennifer

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, IngridPalmqvist, Carl-WilliamBohlin, MarkusSipilä, HansWarg, Jennifer
By organisation
Transport planningThe KTH Railway Group
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 22 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf