Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Extraction of Arsenic from Soils Contaminated with Wood Preservation Chemicals
KTH, Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE), Mark- och vattenteknik. (KTH-International Groundwater Arsenic Research Group (GARG))ORCID-id: 0000-0003-4350-9950
2010 (engelsk)Inngår i: Soil & sediment contamination, ISSN 1532-0383, E-ISSN 1549-7887, Vol. 19, nr 2, s. 142-159Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Three soil samples contaminated by chromated zinc arsenate (CZA) or chromated copper arsenate (CCA) were investigated in a laboratory scale to study As mobilization and to identify a chemical agent that could be used in soil washing to extract arsenic. Besides high As extraction, the cost, occupational health issues and technical aspects were considered when selecting the chemical. Arsenic is strongly bound to CZA/CCA soils; only similar to 50% of the tot-As was removed from water-washed soils. High Fe or Al mobilization is not necessarily indicative of high As removal from CZA/CCA soils. A high Cu/As-ratio and a large amount of soluble Ca in the soil hampered As extraction. The high ratio can be an indication of stable Cu-arsenates in soil. Calcium can react with the extraction agent or with As during extraction. Sodium hydroxide, dithionite with citrate (and oxalate) (dithionite solutions), and oxalate with citrate were the most efficient chemicals for removing As from the soils. The disadvantages of using these strong chemicals are: a high cost (oxalate with citrate); damage to equipment (dithionite solutions); an adverse impact on occupational health (dithionite solutions); or a deterioration in soil quality after extraction (NaOH and dithionite solutons). Phosphate, solutions based on NH2OH center dot HCl, or citrate were not efficient in mobilizing As from the soils.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2010. Vol. 19, nr 2, s. 142-159
Emneord [en]
arsenic, CCA, contaminated soil, extraction, soil washing
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-28302DOI: 10.1080/15320380903390539ISI: 000276430500002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77951146414OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-28302DiVA, id: diva2:386781
Merknad
QC 20110113Tilgjengelig fra: 2011-01-13 Laget: 2011-01-12 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-11bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Bhattacharya, Prosun

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Bhattacharya, Prosun
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Soil & sediment contamination

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 780 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf