Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Learning.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8664-6854
2008 (English)In: Higher Education Research and Development, ISSN 0729-4360, E-ISSN 1469-8366, Vol. 27, no 2, p. 95-106Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper investigates barriers for using course evaluation as a tool for improving student learning, through the analysis of course evaluation practices at The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), a technical university in Stockholm. Although there is a policy on development-focused course evaluation at KTH, several stakeholders have expressed dissatisfaction with its poor results. Interviews were conducted with faculty and student representatives to investigate the perceived purpose and focus of evaluation and its current utilization. Results show that evaluation is teaching- and teacher-focused. As course development is not in the foreground, evaluations merely have a fire alarm function. It is argued that course evaluation should be regarded as a component of constructive alignment, together with the intended learning outcomes, learning activities and assessment. Finally, the concept system alignment is proposed, extending constructive alignment to the institutional level. The evaluation task can generally be said to be: 1. to describe what actually happens in that which seems to happen 2. to tell why precisely this happens, and 3. to state the possibilities for something else to happen. (Franke-Wikberg & Lundgren, 1980, p. 148)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2008. Vol. 27, no 2, p. 95-106
Keywords [en]
course development, course evaluation, evaluation policy, system alignment
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-31135DOI: 10.1080/07294360701805234ISI: 000270805500002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77953956720OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-31135DiVA, id: diva2:402810
Note

QC 20110309

Available from: 2011-03-09 Created: 2011-03-09 Last updated: 2019-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Edström, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edström, Kristina
By organisation
Learning
In the same journal
Higher Education Research and Development
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 345 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf