Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Towards human-like behaviour in spoken dialog systems
KTH, Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), Tal, musik och hörsel, TMH, Tal-kommunikation.
KTH, Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), Tal, musik och hörsel, TMH, Tal-kommunikation.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-9327-9482
KTH, Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), Tal, musik och hörsel, TMH, Tal-kommunikation.
KTH, Skolan för datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), Tal, musik och hörsel, TMH, Tal-kommunikation.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-3585-8077
Vise andre og tillknytning
2006 (engelsk)Inngår i: Proceedings of Swedish Language Technology Conference (SLTC 2006), Gothenburg, Sweden, 2006Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

We and others have found it fruitful to assume that users, when interacting with spoken dialogue systems, perceive the systems and their actions metaphorically. Common metaphors include the human metaphor and the interface metaphor (cf. Edlund, Heldner, & Gustafson, 2006). In the interface metaphor, the spoken dialogue system is perceived as a machine interface – often but not always a computer interface. Speech is used to accomplish what would have otherwise been accomplished by some other means of input, such as a keyboard or a mouse. In the human metaphor, on the other hand, the computer is perceived as a creature (or even a person) with humanlike conversational abilities, and speech is not a substitute or one of many alternatives, but rather the primary means of communicating with this creature. We are aware that more “natural ” or human-like behaviour does not automatically make a spoken dialogue system “better ” (i.e. more efficient or more well-liked by its users). Indeed, we are quite convinced that the advantage (or disadvantage) of humanlike behaviour will be highly dependent on the application. However, a dialogue system that is coherent with a human metaphor may profit from a number of characteristics.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Gothenburg, Sweden, 2006.
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-51935OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-51935DiVA, id: diva2:465229
Konferanse
Swedish Language Technology Conference (SLTC 2006), 27-28 oktober 2006, Göteborg
Merknad
tmh_import_11_12_14. QC 20111230Tilgjengelig fra: 2011-12-14 Laget: 2011-12-14 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-12bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

http://202.114.89.42/resource/pdf/2474.pdf

Personposter BETA

Edlund, JensHjalmarsson, AnnaHouse, DavidSkantze, Gabriel

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Carlson, RolfEdlund, JensHeldner, MattiasHjalmarsson, AnnaHouse, DavidSkantze, Gabriel
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 137 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf