Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Uncommon Ground: Urban Form and Social Territory
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Architecture, Urban Design. (Spatial Analysis and Design (SAD))ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6228-8765
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Implicit in any urban design is a negotiation between public and private interests. Such a negotiation is articulated and made legible in the facades, fences and even more subtle edges separating this from that. A complex variety of spatial situations are produced depending on how spaces are framed, how interfaces are materialized. In the city, the interplay of open space, building and boundary produces a patchwork of subspaces, which we can consider as potential urban territories. Most of us are familiar with the results of territorial production and recognize that fences, furniture or plantings are claims to space by an individual or group. However, the reason to conceive of this process as a territorial production may not be immediately apparent. Consequences of territorial production on percep-tions and behavior are rather under-analyzed, especially in the context of the city. This thesis looks specifically at territorial responses to urban form in the potential social arenas of shared yards in multifamily housing schemes. Drawing on territoriality- and commons-theory as a basis for morphological studies using spatial analysis (e.g. GIS), the thesis proposes that territorial uses of space are in part connected to characteristics of urban form. The thesis explores these spatial underpinnings of claims on space, examining historical, sociological and architectural perspectives and implications on current planning praxis. Parallels are drawn with the role of excludability and rivalry in the production of goods as per commons-theory. Recognizing that even territories like yards perform differently depending on built form characteristics is a step to designing open space with greater social utility. Most notably, the findings that spatial enclosure supports sense of ownership while spaciousness and size support frequency of use is knowledge useful to the practitioner with a role in the production of urban environments, whether in planning, design or construction. With increasing focus on sustainability in urbanism, factoring in social sustainability in land use means recognizing what makes yards inviting to use and elicit feelings of stewardship. Moreover, the importance of legibility at the interface of public and private has implications for design of public space as well. What appears to have been insufficiently problematized in the past are the non-excludable, rivalrous yards which appear to be parks, but do not perform as such territorially. The thesis suggests how a theoretical basis may support design inter-ventions and even densification to resolve such “territorial instability.”

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2016. , 383 p.
Series
TRITA-ARK. Akademisk avhandling, ISSN 1402-7461 ; 2015:2
Keyword [en]
territoriality, interface, social sustainability, morphology, commons, stewardship, open space, yards, spatial analysis
National Category
Architecture
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-183394ISBN: 978-91-7595-823-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-183394DiVA: diva2:910671
Public defence
2016-04-13, Arkitekturskolan, room A123, Osquldas väg 9, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2008-1474
Note

QC 20160310

Available from: 2016-03-10 Created: 2016-03-09 Last updated: 2016-03-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Uncommon Ground(193462 kB)1918 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 193462 kBChecksum SHA-512
f43b18e57756eea672bd41f03a25f14d4bd2fec95ea344fe58c339a02bc472706b99160cddc1a429bae2dd3a4b14380df5a009fc1e560cc86376be3bb3139d35
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Minoura, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Minoura, Eva
By organisation
Urban Design
Architecture

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1922 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 25259 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf