Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Module property verification: A method to plan and perform quality verifications in modular architectures
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production Engineering.
2006 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

Modular product architectures have generated numerous benefits for companies in terms of cost, lead-time and quality. The defined interfaces and the module’s properties decrease the effort to develop new product variants, and provide an opportunity to perform parallel tasks in design, manufacturing and assembly. The background of this thesis is that companies perform verifications (tests, inspections and controls) of products late, when most of the parts have been assembled. This extends the lead-time to delivery and ruins benefits from a modular product architecture; specifically when the verifications are extensive and the frequency of detected defects is high. Due to the number of product variants obtained from the modular product architecture, verifications must handle a wide range of equipment, instructions and goal values to ensure that high quality products can be delivered. As a result, the total benefits from a modular product architecture are difficult to achieve.

This thesis describes a method for planning and performing verifications within a modular product architecture. The method supports companies by utilizing the defined modules for verifications already at module level, so called MPV (Module Property Verification). With MPV, defects are detected at an earlier point, compared to verification of a complete product, and the number of verifications is decreased.

The MPV method is built up of three phases. In Phase A, candidate modules are evaluated on the basis of costs and lead-time of the verifications and the repair of defects. An MPV-index is obtained which quantifies the module and indicates if the module should be verified at product level or by MPV. In Phase B, the interface interaction between the modules is evaluated, as well as the distribution of properties among the modules. The purpose is to evaluate the extent to which supplementary verifications at product level is needed. Phase C supports a selection of the final verification strategy. The cost and lead-time for the supplementary verifications are considered together with the results from Phase A and B.

The MPV method is based on a set of qualitative and quantitative measures and tools which provide an overview and support the achievement of cost and time efficient company specific verifications. A practical application in industry shows how the MPV method can be used, and the subsequent benefits

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH , 2006. , x, 252 p.
Trita-IIP, ISSN 1650-1888 ; 06:03
Keyword [en]
modular products, product architecture, product verification, test, inspection, product assembly, defects
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-3965OAI: diva2:10205
Public defence
2006-05-22, Sal M3, Brinellvägen 64, Stockholm, 10:00
QC 20100906Available from: 2006-05-15 Created: 2006-05-15 Last updated: 2010-09-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kenger, Patrik
By organisation
Production Engineering
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1008 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link