2006 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other scientific)
This study explores the application of the dialogue seminar method within a doctoral programme KTH Advanced Programme in Reflective Practice of the research area of Skill and technology at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm. In order to understand distinctive features of the dialogue seminar method the study starts with a survey of how the method and its spirit were affected by the history of ideas related to the research area, of which many were generated within the intellectual milieu gathered around the Dialogue seminar of the Royal Dramatic Theatre in Stockholm and cultural journal Dialoger.
The dialogue seminar method stands for a well thought out idea about what the link between skills, literature, philosophy, history of ideas, art and science is made up of. This idea is expressed in the way the dialogue is conducted; various topics are explored through associations, digressions and deviations form the subject. This indirect approach to reflection is called analogical thinking in contrast to the thinking based on deduction or induction. Analogical thinking prevails in judgement and action. It is also of great significance in e.g. development projects, in arts, all sorts of problem-solving, and those phases of research that call for inventiveness and imagination.
The Dialogue Seminar’s Research Milieu brings up new questions about the possibilities of pursuing scientific or methodological reflection by means of analogical thinking and about the status of classical humanistic readings within the post graduate education.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH , 2006. , 268 p.
Trita-IEO, ISSN 1100-7982 ; R 2006: 09
doctoral programs, dialogue seminar method, reflection, skills, analogical thinking
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-3975ISBN: 91-975060-8-7OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-3975DiVA: diva2:10237
2006-06-05, F3, Lindstedtsv. 26, Stockholm, 10:00
Lindseth, Anders, Professor
Göranzon, BoHammarén, Maria
QC 201006292006-05-172006-05-172012-01-30Bibliographically approved