Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Studies of Two-Phase Flow at a Chute Aerator with Experiments and CFD Modelling
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering.
2016 (English)In: Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, ISSN 1687-5591, E-ISSN 1687-5605, 4729128Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The chute aerator of a spillway is a structure in such a sense that air is, in the intense emulsification, entrained into the high-velocity water flow. Correctly predicting the air entrainment and two-phase flow pattern at the aerator would contribute to reliable spillway operation. Based on experimental data, 2D numerical simulations are preformed to predict streamwise air concentrations in the aerated flow, in which a two-fluid model is used. Depending on the air bubble size, relatively good agreement is seen with the experiments in the air cavity zone. The simulations give rise to higher air concentration downstream of the cavity, which is presumably due to underestimation of the interfacial forces in the two-fluid model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2016. 4729128
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-193272DOI: 10.1155/2016/4729128ISI: 000382691500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84986285599OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-193272DiVA: diva2:1033567
Note

QC 20161007

Available from: 2016-10-07 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. CFD MODELLING OF TWO-PHASE FLOWS AT SPILLWAY AERATORS
Open this publication in new window or tab >>CFD MODELLING OF TWO-PHASE FLOWS AT SPILLWAY AERATORS
2017 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Due to the high-speed flow in a chute spillway, cavitation damages often occur. This undesired phenomenon threatens the safety of the structure. For the purpose of eliminating the damages, an aerator is often installed in the spillway. To understand its characteristics, physical model tests are a popular method. To complement the model tests, computation fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are used to study aerator flows. To represent the two-phase flows, multiphase models should be employed. This thesis examines two of them, namely, the Volume-Of-Fluid model (VOF) and Two-Fluid model.

Based on the background of the Bergeforsen dam, the aerator flow is modelled by means of the VOF model. The simulated spillway discharge capacity is in accordance with the experimental data. Compared with the results, empirical formulas fail to evaluate the air supply capacity of aerator as it is wider than the conventional width. A hypothetical vent modification is proposed. For the original and proposed layouts, the study illustrates the difference in the air-flow conditions. The results show that a larger vent area is, for a large-width aerator, preferable in the middle of the chute.

To study the flip bucket-shaped aerators in the Gallejaur dam, physical model tests and prototype observations are conducted. The results lead to contradicting conclusions in terms of jet breakup and air entrainment. A CFD model is, as an option, employed to explain the reason of the discrepancy. The numerical results coincide with the prototype observations. The jet breakup and air entrainment are evaluated from air cavity profiles; the air-pressure drops are small in the cavity. The discrepancy is due to overestimation of the surface-tension effect in the physical model tests.

Based on the experimental data of an aerator rig at the Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW), ETH Zurich, the Two-Fluid model is used to predict air concentration distributions in the aerated flow. The model includes relevant forces governing the motion of bubbles and considers the effects of air bubble size. The numerical results are conformable to the experiments in the air cavity zone. Downstream of the cavity, the air concentration near the chute bottom is higher, which is presumably caused by the fact that the interfacial forces in the Two-Fluid model are underestimated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH, 2017. 44 p.
Series
TRITA-HYD, 2017:02
Keyword
spillway; cavitation; aerator; air entrainment; air–water flow; VOF model; Two-Fluid model
National Category
Other Civil Engineering
Research subject
Civil and Architectural Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-202392 (URN)978-91-7729-304-0 (ISBN)
Presentation
2017-03-20, B24, Brinellvägen 23, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

QC 20170224

Available from: 2017-02-24 Created: 2017-02-23 Last updated: 2017-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Teng, Penghua
By organisation
Civil and Architectural Engineering
In the same journal
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf