Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How to be Cautious but Open to Learning: Time to Update Biotechnology and GMO Legislation
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0071-3919
2016 (English)In: Risk Analysis, ISSN 0272-4332, E-ISSN 1539-6924, Vol. 36, no 8, p. 1513-1517Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Precautionary measures to protect human health and the environment should be science based. This implies that they should be directed at a potential danger for which there is credible scientific evidence (although that evidence need not be conclusive). Furthermore, protective measures should be updated as relevant science advances. This means that decisionmakers should be prepared to strengthen the precautionary measures if the danger turns out to be greater than initially suspected, and to reduce or lift them, should the danger prove to be smaller. Most current legislation on agricultural biotechnology has not been scientifically updated. Therefore, it reflects outdated criteria for identifying products that can cause problems. Modern knowledge in genetics, plant biology, and ecology has provided us with much better criteria that risk analysts can use to identify the potentially problematic breeding projects at which precautionary measures should be directed. Legislation on agricultural biotechnology should be scientifically updated. Furthermore, legislators should learn from this example that regulations based on the current state of science need to have inbuilt mechanisms for revisions and adjustments in response to future developments in science.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Publishing, 2016. Vol. 36, no 8, p. 1513-1517
Keywords [en]
Agricultural biotechnology, GMO, plant breeding, precautionary principle, science-based precaution
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-194022DOI: 10.1111/risa.12647ISI: 000383771600002PubMedID: 27305655Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84984663175OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-194022DiVA, id: diva2:1037610
Note

QC 20161017

Available from: 2016-10-17 Created: 2016-10-14 Last updated: 2018-01-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hansson, Sven Ove
By organisation
Philosophy
In the same journal
Risk Analysis
Occupational Health and Environmental Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 120 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf