Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Protection without Discrimination: Pregnancy and Occupational Health Regulations
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0071-3919
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3799-4814
2016 (English)In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, ISSN 1867-299X, E-ISSN 2190-8249, Vol. 7, no 2, 404-412 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Occupational exposures of pregnant workers can give rise to foetal damage. Two major types of strategies against detrimental effects on the foetus are described: differentiated protection that reduces only the exposure of pregnant workers (or only of female workers) and unified protection that reduces the exposure of all workers to a level that is sufficiently low to protect against detrimental effects on the foetus. The former strategy is shown to be inefficient, as it does not provide the desired protection. Protection only of pregnant workers is insufficient since protection is needed early in pregnancy when it is not known, and in the case of substances that are accumulated in the woman's body even prior to conception. Protection of all women is also insufficient to protect the foetus since evidence indicates that preconception exposure of the father can also give rise to malformations. Furthermore, differentiated protection that requires more costly protective measures for women tends to aggravate the already prevalent discrimination of women on the labour market. It is therefore concluded that unified protection is the only efficient and non-discriminatory strategy against foetal damage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH , 2016. Vol. 7, no 2, 404-412 p.
Keyword [en]
occupational health
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-198610Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85002648102OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-198610DiVA: diva2:1057612
Note

QC 20170118

Available from: 2016-12-19 Created: 2016-12-19 Last updated: 2017-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Scopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hansson, Sven OveSchenk, Linda
By organisation
Philosophy
In the same journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf