Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The complexity of becoming: Collaborative planning and cultural heritage
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.), Organization and management.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, ISSN 2044-1266, E-ISSN 2044-1274, Vol. 3, no 2, 148-162 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose — The purpose of this paper is to examine a pilot in a national R&D programme in Norway (2007-2010) to join the ongoing discussion on the different meanings and uses of planning tools and approaches in cultural heritage across various disciplines. The study aimed to reveal how patterns of collaborative planning processes unfold in a complex cultural heritage setting, the key challenges, dilemmas and tensions in the different phases of the process and implications for future research and policy. – Longitudinal explorative dialogic action research was undertaken to investigate and capture the evolution of knowledge-creating processes. The qualitative data collection methods included 25 semi-structured interviews, focus group interviews, participatory observation and text and document analysis. – Experiential R&D activities can bridge and transcend the context-specific tensions that separate the involved actors and their activities. Furthermore, a pro-active cultural heritage authority is required at the national level to maintain supportive links to the local level, and it is necessary to manage and prevent potential opportunistic action from negatively affecting cultural heritage sites and processes. – The single case study approach makes generalising beyond the current study difficult. However, the findings raise relevant issues for further research on the management of cultural heritage policy from a sustainable development perspective. – This paper identifies the need to study the evolving processes of linking cultural heritage, sustainable development and collaborative planning, as well as the dynamic relationship between the national, regional and local levels of heritage management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013. Vol. 3, no 2, 148-162 p.
Keyword [en]
Adaptive reuse, Collaborative planning, Cultural heritage, Industrial heritage, Participatory planning, Public-private partnerships, Sustainable development
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-201895DOI: 10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2012-0053ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84993070627OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-201895DiVA: diva2:1079304
Note

QC 20170308

Available from: 2017-03-08 Created: 2017-03-08 Last updated: 2017-03-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
Organization and management
In the same journal
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf