Forest carbon balances at the landscape scale investigated with the Q model and the CoupModel - Responses to intensified harvests
2013 (English)In: Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN 0378-1127, E-ISSN 1872-7042, Vol. 290, 67-78 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
The increasing demand for solid biofuels, such as logging residue fuels, has highlighted the importance of considering that, in contrast to fossil fuels, biofuels are produced in dynamic ecosystems. The environmental effects of changes in management policy, whether positive and negative, are not obvious. For example, calculations of the carbon budget in single forest stands show that the carbon balance switches dramatically from uptake to loss at final felling. The time taken to recover the carbon losses after disturbance can span decades to centuries. However, forests are not managed on the single stand level but on the landscape scale. Thus, for example, final felling occurs by definition only once for each rotation period on the whole area considered in a single stand, but within the same time span, it occurs frequently on a fraction of the area in a landscape. The actual frequency and ratio of land area affected each year by final felling depend on the age distribution and rotation age of all stands present in the landscape. In order to reliably evaluate the consequences of new management policies, the aggregated effects of a number of individual stands need to be considered. Here we used two different ecosystem models (the Q model and the CoupModel) to compare the carbon budgets of conventional harvesting of stems on a single-stand level and on the landscape scale under different harvesting intensities. In the calculations, the landscape was assumed to consist of many stands, all of different ages and each representing one year of a given rotation period. The results showed that the aggregated carbon balance in the forest landscape was less dramatic than that of a single stand. Provided that environmental factors and management policy remain unchanged, the aggregated carbon balance remains stable over time in any landscape. However, the carbon gains from harvesting and its effects on soil carbon stock occur on different time scales. While any change in harvesting system takes a long time to be fully implemented, changes in the proportion of increased removals take effect without delay, while components of soil organic carbon have response times longer than centuries. The carbon gain after introducing removal of logging residues starts to increase immediately at the first harvest in a landscape. The quantities of soil carbon lost with the increased removals are always less than the removals in biomass. Soil carbon losses show a declining response over time. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2013. Vol. 290, 67-78 p.
Bioenergy, Carbon debt, Landscape carbon balance, Logging residue fuel, Rotation forestry, Sustainable forest management SFM, Age distribution, Bio-energy, Carbon balance, Carbon budgets, Carbon loss, Different time scale, Ecosystem model, Environmental factors, Forest landscape, Forest stand, Harvesting system, Land areas, Landscape scale, Logging residues, Management policy, Rotation period, Soil carbon, Soil carbon stock, Soil organic carbon, Solid bio-fuels, Stand levels, Sustainable forest management, Time span, Aggregates, Biofuels, Budget control, Ecosystems, Environmental management, Fossil fuels, Harvesting, Logging (forestry), Rotation, Soils, Carbon, biofuel, biomass, carbon budget, ecosystem modeling, environmental effect, environmental factor, forest management, forestry, fossil fuel, fractionation, landscape, logging (timber), numerical model, policy making, soil organic matter, stand structure, sustainable development, timescale, Logging, Mathematical Models, Soil
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-178730DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.007ISI: 000315015600009ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84872681606OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-178730DiVA: diva2:1083770
References: Ågren, G.I., Andersson, F.O., (2011) Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology - Principles and Applications, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Ågren, G.I., Bosatta, E., (1998) Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology - Understanding Element Cycles, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Ågren, G.I., Hyvönen, R., Changes in carbon stores in Swedish forest soils due to increased biomass harvest and increased temperatures analysed with a semi-empirical model (2003) For. Ecol. Manage., 174, pp. 25-37; Ågren, G.I., Hyvönen, R., Nilsson, T., Are Swedish forest soils sinks or sources for CO2 - model analyses based on forest inventory data (2007) Biogeochemistry, 82, pp. 217-227; http://www.birdlife.org/eu/pdfs/carbon_bomb_21_06_2010.pdf, Anonymous. (accessed 12.02.12.)Bruun, S., Jensen, L.S., Initialisation of the soil organic matter pools of the Daisy model (2002) Ecol. Modell., 153, pp. 291-295; Colnes, A., Doshi, K., Emick, H., Evans, A., Perschel, R., Robards, T., Saah, D., Sherman, A., Biomass Supply and Carbon Accounting for Southeastern Forests (2012) Biomass Energy Resource Center, , Forest Guild, Spatial Informatics Group (BERC), the Forest Guild, and Spatial Informatics Group, Montpelier, Vermont, USA; Egnell, G., Is the productivity decline in Norway spruce following whole-tree harvesting in the final felling in boreal Sweden permanent or temporary? (2011) For. Ecol. Manage., 261, pp. 148-153; Eliasson, P., Ågren, G.I., Feedback from soil inorganic nitrogen on soil organic matter mineralisation and growth in a boreal forest ecosystem (2011) Plant Soil, 338, pp. 193-203; Eliasson, P.E., McMurtrie, R.E., Pepper, D.A., Strömgren, M., Linder, S., Ågren, G.I., The response of heterotrophic CO2-flux to soil warming (2005) Glob. Change Biol., 11, pp. 167-181; European Union, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77EC and 2003/30/EC (2009) Off. J. Eur. Union, 52, pp. 16-62; Gustavsson, L., Eriksson, L., Sathre, R., Costs and CO2 benefits of recovering, refining and transporting logging residues for fossil fuel replacement (2011) Appl. Energy, 88, pp. 192-197; Hägglund, B., Samband mellan ståndortsindex H100 och bonitet för tall och gran i Sverige (1981), Samband mellan ståndortsindex H100 och bonitet för tall och gran i Sverige. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Science, Report 26Jansson, P.-E., Karlberg, L., Coupled heat and mass transfer model for soil-plant-atmosphere systems (2004) Coupled heat and mass transfer model for soil-plant-atmosphere systems, , Royal Institute of Technology, Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Report 3087; Law, B.E., Harmon, M.E., Forest sector carbon management, measurement and verification, and discussion of policy related to climate change (2011) Carbon Manage., 2, pp. 73-84; Liski, J., Pussinen, A., Pingoud, K., Mäkipää, R., Karjalainen, T., Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration? (2001) Can. J. For. Res., 31, pp. 2004-2013; Loehle, C., Climate change is an onion (2008) J. For., 106, pp. 450-451; Marklund, L.G., Biomass Functions for Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Sweden (1987), Biomass Functions for Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Forest Survey, Report 43Mitchell, S.R., Harmon, M.E., O'Connell, K.E.B., Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production (2012) Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy; Nylund, J.-E., Forestry Legislation in Sweden. Forestry Legislation in Sweden (2009), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Products, Report 14Ortiz, C., Karltun, E., Stendahl, J., Gärdenäs, A.I., Ågren, G.I., Modelling soil carbon development in Swedish coniferous forest soils - An uncertainty analysis of parameters and model estimates using the GLUE method (2011) Ecol. Modell., 222, pp. 3020-3032; Rolff, C., Ågren, G.I., Predicting effects of different harvesting intensities with a model of nitrogen limited forest growth (1999) Ecol. Modell., 118, pp. 193-211; Romero, C., Ros, V., Rios, V., Daz-Balteiro, L., Diaz-Balteiro, L., Optimal forest rotation age when carbon captured is considered: theory and applications (1998) J. Oper. Res. Soc., 49, pp. 121-131; Svensson, M., Jansson, P.-E., Berggren Kleja, D., Modelling soil C sequestration in spruce forest ecosystems along a Swedish transect based on current conditions (2008) Biogeochemistry, 89, pp. 95-119; (2011) Energy in Sweden - Facts and Figures 2010, , Swedish Energy Agency. Swedish Energy Agency, Stockholm; (1985), Swedish Forest Agency. Gallringsmallar - Norra Sverige. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden(1985), Swedish Forest Agency. Gallringsmallar - Södra Sverige. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden(2007), Swedish Forest Agency. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden(2010), Swedish Forest Agency. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden(2011), Swedish Forest Agency. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, SwedenZanchi, G., Pena, N., Bird, N., http://www.birdlife.org/eu/pdfs/Bioenergy_Joanneum_Research.pdf, (accessed 12.02.12.)UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84872681606&partnerID=40&md5=99143bea02fdf58a1fa18cb8d2a21b21. QC 201704112017-03-222017-03-222017-04-11Bibliographically approved