Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fuji as a European Mountain? Universal heritage value, local identities and changing landscapes at a new world heritage site.
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, History of Science, Technology and Environment.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5709-0217
Mt Fuji World Heritage Research Centre.
2016 (English)Conference paper, Abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Mt. Fuji is a mountain that is visible from the whole world – as a symbol of the Japanese state or the great Orient, its images are featured in virtually every Japan-related brochure and merchandize well beyond  the geographical constraints of the Archipelago.

The present paper asks several provocative questions: to what extent are the Western perceptions of Mt. Fuji  embedded into the constructed „universal heritage value“ in its UNESCO World Heritage nomination process; how does the defined universal value relate to the local identity value of Mt Fuji cultural landscape; and how does the contemporary perception of both universal and local value of the place relate to the evidence of its long-term  history of land use? To what extent can we claim that its nomination as a „sacred place and source of artistic inspiration“ casts the mountain in terms of European values and perception of the place, and how well does it accommodate different identities and uses on local level? And on the other hand, to what  extent are the present local identities related to historical land use before the rapid modernization?

To answer these and related questions, we will use a variety of sources from interviews with people involved in world heritage nomination process, nomination materials, media sources, but also historical evidence of past landscape use, such as maps, historical documents and archaeological data. While the people involved in the construction of „universal value“ lament the excessive pressure by the Western experts, the local inhabitants express bewilderment about the nomination as a site of worship and art. How and by whom was the mountain used is a key question in addressing these claims. An additional theoretical issue involved in the discussion is how much should the present local identities and evaluations be included in the construction of heritage value in case of a massive landscape change that completely changes millenia-long practices? 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Innsbruck, Austria, 2016.
National Category
History Human Geography Social Anthropology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-204475OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-204475DiVA: diva2:1084892
Conference
PECSRL 2016
Note

QC 20170418

Available from: 2017-03-27 Created: 2017-03-27 Last updated: 2017-04-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://www.pecsrl2016.com/

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindström, Kati
By organisation
History of Science, Technology and Environment
HistoryHuman GeographySocial Anthropology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf