Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Markanknutna gemensamma nyttigheter: en analysmodell för byggande, underhåll, användning och finansiering
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Real Estate and Construction Management, Real Estate Planning and Land Law.
2006 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

This thesis deals with appropriate legislation concerning common utilities, such as infra-structural facilities and natural resources, which can regulate construction, maintenance, use and financing. Appropriate legislation can be viewed in the two main perspectives, effi-ciency and equity, and the thesis concerns primarily on efficiency.

The purpose is to develop an analytical model, which can be used to facilitate structured assessments concerning the management of common utilities. The problem field concerned is of great complexity, and the model is therefore to be viewed as a support for decision-making, not as an instrument capable of delivering ready-made solutions.

To structure the problem area it’s divided into three parts, the social, physical and institu-tional environments.

The social environment is concerned with factors, such as group size and amount of trust and social capital, which can influence the feasibility of co-operation. The analysis leads to a classification of three social groups: Close-knit, loosely-knit and anonymous.

The physical environment is concerned with characteristics of utilities, which influences need for, and feasibility of, co-operation. Rivalry of use and excludability are identified as important factors in this aspect. By combining them six types of goods can be identified: Private goods, club goods, common pool resources, toll goods, public goods and local pub-lic goods.

The institutional environment is concerned with rules, which can control the use of com-mon utilities. Two concepts are identified as pivotal: property rights regimes and decision-making procedures. There are four property rights regimes: Individual rights, group rights, public rights (limited and unlimited) and no rights. Furthermore there are three decision-making procedures: Market regulation, group decision-making and public decision-making. A fourth possibility is no decision making-forum.

By linking together social groups and types of goods a matrix is obtained in which each square represents a unique combination of social and physical environment. In this analyti-cal framework it is analysed which combinations of property rights regimes and decision-making procedures that are best suited to each square.

In the end, Swedish legislation on roads, water and sewerage installations and aesthetic design of buildings is analysed with aid of the analytical model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: KTH , 2006. , 243 p.
Trita-FAT, ISSN 0348-9469
Keyword [en]
Land use planning, public utilities, law and economics, economic efficiency, property rights, decision-making procedures, collective action
National Category
Civil Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-4139ISBN: 91-7178-444-9OAI: diva2:10899
Public defence
2006-11-03, Salongen, KTHB, Osquars Backe 31, Stockholm, 10:00
QC 20100825Available from: 2006-10-10 Created: 2006-10-10 Last updated: 2010-08-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(862 kB)1204 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 862 kBChecksum MD5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bucht, Martin
By organisation
Real Estate Planning and Land Law
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1204 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 589 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link