Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Beyond Coercion: Moral Assessment in the Labour Market
Philosophy and History, KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Philosophy and History of Technology, Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1765-8987
2017 (English)In: Journal of Business Ethics, ISSN 0167-4544, E-ISSN 1573-0697, Vol. 142, no 1, 59-70 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Some libertarians argue that informed consent alone makes transactions in the labour market morally justified. In contrast, some of their critics claim that such an act of consent is no guarantee against coercion. To know whether agreements are voluntary, we need to assess the quality of the offers or the prevailing background conditions. ISCT theorists argue that it is imperative to take social norms into account when evaluating the labour market. We present a novel framework for moral assessment in the labour market, which takes consent, background conditions and norms into account, but which mainly focuses on the offers and demands made. Consent renders a transaction legitimate in the same way we regard a fair election legitimate even if we object to its outcome. For offers to be substantially justified, exploitation must be avoided and offers must give expression to the value of community. Only then they are morally justified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2017. Vol. 142, no 1, 59-70 p.
Keyword [en]
Coercion, Consent, Exploitation, Labour market, Legitimacy, Moral community
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-208270DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2736-8ISI: 000399659100004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84935123787OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-208270DiVA: diva2:1109561
Note

QC 20170614

Available from: 2017-06-14 Created: 2017-06-14 Last updated: 2017-06-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Munter, Dan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Munter, Dan
By organisation
Philosophy
In the same journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 5 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf