Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Deploying traditional and smartphone app survey methods in measuring door-to-door travel satisfaction in eight European cities
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Centres, Centre for Transport Studies, CTS. KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Centres, Centre for Traffic Research, CTR. KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport Science, Transport Planning, Economics and Engineering. KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Transport Science, System Analysis and Economics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7124-7164
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH - WCTR 2016 / [ed] Ulengin, F Li, K Boltze, M, 2017, p. 2262-2280Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This study describes the lessons learned from designing, deploying and analysing the results from different travel satisfaction survey tools which measures the travellers' door-to-door travel satisfaction. The travel satisfaction measurement survey tools tested consisted of two types of smartphone applications (a satellite navigation app and a game app), an on-line survey, a paper based semi-structured questionnaire and a focus group questionnaire. Each of the measurement tools comprised the same set of basic questions, but in different formats, aimed at exploring the pros and cons of each tool among different groups of travellers. The data collection was carried out at eight different European cities and five FIA motorist networks. 5,275 valid responses were gathered from the survey. Further analysis results show that different survey methods performed better in different sites. The satisfaction that was gathered via main trip leg does not necessarily correspond with overall satisfaction of the door-to-door journey. The results of this study highlight the need for more inclusive, complete, door-to-door, travel survey measurements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. p. 2262-2280
Series
Transportation Research Procedia, ISSN 2352-1465 ; 25
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-211763DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.434ISI: 000404963802026Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85019397791OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-211763DiVA, id: diva2:1130816
Conference
14th World Conference on Transport Research (WCTR), JUL 10-15, 2016, Tongji Univ Shanghai, Shanghai, PEOPLES R CHINA
Note

QC 20170811

Available from: 2017-08-11 Created: 2017-08-11 Last updated: 2017-08-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Susilo, YusakAbenoza, Roberto

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Susilo, YusakAbenoza, Roberto
By organisation
Centre for Transport Studies, CTSCentre for Traffic Research, CTRTransport Planning, Economics and EngineeringSystem Analysis and Economics
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf